Affiliation:
1. Departments of Surgery and Microbiology, The General Hospital, Birmingham, UK
Abstract
Abstract
Forty-three patients undergoing a restorative colorectal resection were randomized to have their rectal stump washed out with either 0·9 per cent saline, 2·5 per cent povidone—iodine or 0·3 per cent sodium hypochlorite. The bacterial counts before and after washout for Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis were compared using the Mann—Whitney U test. There was no significant difference in the counts for E. coli before and after washout with saline (log 9·7–log 9·7 organisms/ml) and saline had no influence on the counts of B. fragilis (log 7·9–log 6·5 organisms/ml). Hypochlorite was associated with a significant reduction in E. coli counts (log 6·1–log 1·1 organisms/ml, P < 0·005) and the counts of B. fragilis (log 8·1–log 0·0 organisms/ml, P < 0·005). The counts of B. fragilis were significantly reduced by povidone—iodine (log 8·1–log 1·1 organisms/ml, P < 0·005) but there was no significant reduction in counts of E. coli (log 5·6–log 5·3 organisms/ml). The data suggest that sodium hypochlorite is better than povidone—iodine or saline as a rectal washout for colorectal anastomosis.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献