Lower limb vein trauma: A long-term clinical and physiological assessment

Author:

Aitken R J1,Matley P J1,Immelman E J1

Affiliation:

1. The Vascular Laboratory, The Department of Surgery, The University of Cape Town and Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this study was to assess the long-term clinical and physiological sequelae of lower limb venous trauma in a civilian practice. Twenty-six patients who had undergone surgery for lower limb venous trauma (median elapsed time 19·5 months) underwent assessment. Injuries had been sustained to the external iliac, common femoral, superficial femoral and popliteal veins in two, four, nine and eleven limbs respectively. Using clinical assessment, photoplethysmography recovery time, the presence of popliteal reflux and venographic evidence of thrombosis, the final outcome was graded as good, fair or poor. Fourteen patients had pedal oedema, including two with a postphlebitic limb. The overall photoplethysmography recovery time (mean and s.d.) was 20·6 (8·7)s in the injured and 32·1 (6·7)s in the non-injured limbs (P = 0·002). Patients with a venographically occluded vein had a shorter photoplethysmography recovery time than those in whom the vein was patent (13·4 (5·6) versus 21·6 (8·7)s; P = 0·07). Popliteal reflux was present in 12 injured limbs. Seven of 12 venograms performed on limbs with a vein repair had evidence of previous thrombosis. Vein ligation carried considerable morbidity and all end-to-end anastomoses initially failed. In retrospect, saphenous vein grafts were too narrow for the recipient veins and panel grafts might have been more appropriate. Overall 11 of 26 patients (42 per cent) had a poor result. The repair of choice is a saphenous vein patch for lesser injuries and a saphenous panel graft for major injuries. Vein ligation should be avoided unless another life-threatening injury demands priority.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3