Affiliation:
1. Department of Surgery II, Hospital Clinico S. Carlos, Madrid, Spain
2. Department of Digestive Surgery II, C. S. 1° de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
Abstract
Abstract
To evaluate the effectiveness of somatostatin versus combined cimetidine and pirenzepine in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding of peptic origin, a multicentre controlled, prospective, randomized and double blind trial has been undertaken in 60 subjects. Strict selection criteria were followed. All subjects were diagnosed by endoscopy during the first 18 h after admission. Endoscopic stigmata of recent haemorrhage were also evaluated. Sixty-five per cent of the subjects presented with severe upper GI bleeding (blood pressure ⩽ 100 mmHg, pulse rate ⩾ 110, haematocrit ⩽ 30 per cent), and in 71·6 per cent stigmata were found. Thirty patients (Group 1) received a somatostatin infusion (250 μ/h continuously during 120 h) and 30 patients (Group 2) received cimetidine (200 mg IV every 4 h for 5 days) and pirenzepine (10 mg IV every 8 h for 5 days). Both groups were homogeneous for sex, age, backgrounds, bleeding source, grade of bleeding (moderate or severe) and presence or not of stigmata. Bleeding stopped in 27 subjects of Group 1 (90 per cent and in 20 subjects of Group 2 (66·67 per cent) (P < 0·05, χ2 test). The time until the bleeding stopped was significantly shorter in patients of group 1 (3·44 ± 0·53 h) than in patients of group 2 (8·12 ± 1·94 h) (P < 0·05, Mann–Whitney U test). The number of blood units required for Group 1 (2·26 ± 0·35) was significantly lower than the one required for Group 2 (3·90 ± 0·51) (P < 0·005, Wilcoxon test). Significant differences were not observed between the two groups regarding cross-over subjects, rebleeding, surgery (P = 0·0635, Fisher's exact test) and hospital stay. The mortality of the trial was 5 per cent. There was no toxicity during somatostatin, cimetidine or pirenzepine infusion. In conclusion, somatostatin was more effective than cimetidine plus pirenzepine in the control of severe upper GI bleeding of peptic origin, with a lower interval time to stop bleeding and reduced transfusion requirements.
Funder
Spanish Technical and Scientific Research Committee
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference29 articles.
1. Does early endoscopy benefit the patient with active upper gastrointestinal bleeding?;Eastwood;Gastroenterology,1977
2. Massive gastrointestinal haemorrhage: a 25 year experience with vagotomy and drainage surgical;McGregor;Surgery,1976
3. Antacid versus cimetidine in preventing acute gastrointestinal bleeding;Priebe;N Engl J Med,1980
4. Cimetidine and tranexamic acid in the treatment of acute upper-gastrointestinal-tract bleeding;Barer;N Engl J Med,1983
5. Endoscopic electrocoagulation of actively bleeding arterial upper gastrointestinal lesions;Papp;Am J Gastroenterol,1979
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Post‐ICU Care and Other Complications;Manual of Perioperative Care in Adult Cardiac Surgery;2020-11-15
2. Post-ICU Care and Other Complications;Manual of Perioperative Care in Adult Cardiac Surgery;2010-11-30
3. Acute Non‐Variceal Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: Treatment;Evidence‐Based Gastroenterology and Hepatology;2010-07-22
4. Behandlung des unkomplizierten Ulcus duodeni mit Cimetidin allein und kombiniert mit Pirenzepin: Eine Vergleichsstudie;DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift;2008-03-25
5. Rolling review: upper gastrointestinal bleeding;Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics;2007-03-31