Affiliation:
1. II. Department of Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, FRG
Abstract
Abstract
Two techniques for preparation of the colon for colonoscopy were compared in a controlled trial. Fifty patients given a low residue diet and the laxative Prepacol® were compared with 50 patients given whole gut irrigation. Significantly more patients suffered from vomiting (P = 0·0005), shivering (P = 0·0062) and nausea (P = 0·031) following irrigation; in two cases the procedure had to be abandoned because of profuse vomiting. Irrigation was less well tolerated by the patients (P = 0·00002) than preparation with Prepacol®. On the other hand, the quality of bowel preparation was found to be better (P = 0·0005) after irrigation. On two occasions colonoscopy was not possible following Prepacol® preparation because of faecal residue. Patients with a previous colorectal resection showed a similar quality of cleansing to those patients prepared with irrigation. We conclude that Prepacol® is as efficient as irrigation for patients who have had a previous colorectal resection because the quality of bowel preparation is as good and the associated patient discomfort is small.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference17 articles.
1. The effect of bowel preparation on colonic surgery;Hares;World J Surg,1982
2. Preparation of the colon for flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy;De Luca;Gastrointest Endosc,1980
3. Comparison of colon cleansing methods in preparation for colonoscopy;DiPalma;Gastroenterology,1984
4. Whole gut irrigation in preparation for large bowel surgery;Hewitt;Lancet,1973
5. Preparation of the bowel by whole gut irrigation;Crapo;Lancet,1975
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献