Splenic injury: A prospective multicentre study on non-operative and operative treatment

Abstract

Abstract One hundred and forty-seven patients with splenic injury admitted to 18 different hospitals were included in a prospective multicentre study. The spleen was saved in 64 per cent. Out of the total series, 43 per cent of patients were not operated upon, 5 per cent had exploratory laparotomy only, and in 16 per cent splenic repair was performed. Treatment is discussed with reference to the nature of the splenic lesion, concomitant injuries, amount of blood transfusion given, and age of the patient. No deaths were definitely related to the splenic injury. The frequency of serious recurrent bleeding was not higher in the splenic salvage group when compared with the splenectomy group. Delayed bleeding was detected in 4 per cent of the patients. The mode of treatment varied considerably in different hospitals in that conservative treatment was performed in 14, splenic repair in 10 and splenectomy in 12 hospitals. Splenic salvage seems safe in most patients with a splenic injury. However, meticulous surveillance of the patient is mandatory.