Affiliation:
1. Department of Surgery, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK
2. Department of Biochemical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK
Abstract
Abstract
To date, tumour markers for gastric cancer have proved unreliable. In this study the value of a new serum marker, CA 72–4, was compared with the serum activities of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA19-9 in a consecutive series of patients with gastric cancer. The results show that the CAT2-4 assay is significantly better at separating stage I and II disease from normal controls (P < 0·01) than CEA (n.s.) or CA19-9 (n.s.). CA72-4 also gave better differentiation between patients with positive and negative nodes (P < 0·01) and between those who were serosa positive and negative (P < 0·01). CEA differentiated between patients with positive and negative nodes (P < 0·05) but CA19-9 could not. CA19-9 and CEA could not discriminate between patients who were serosa positive and negative. In this study, at a specificity of 95 per cent, the sensitivities of CEA, C A19-9 and CA72-4 were 0·25, 0·41 and 0·94 respectively. These preliminary findings indicate that CA 72-4 is a reliable tumour marker of disease stage and activity in gastric cancer. Further longitudinal studies are required for full evaluation of its clinical utility.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Cited by
59 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献