Affiliation:
1. Scarborough Hospital, North Yorkshire
Abstract
Abstract
In a series of 410 consecutive potentially contaminated operations, we have compared the relative efficacy of intra-incisional cephaloridine and ampieillin in single doses of 1 g in 2 ml of water. In high risk operations (ileocolorectal surgery, perforated appendicitis, or when the patient has 2·5 cm or more of subcutaneous fat at the site of the incision) cephaloridine prophylaxis resulted in a primary sepsis rate of 14 per cent compared with 36 per cent for ampicillin. In all other patients the two antibiotics were equally effective. Secondary sepsis, following discharge from the wound of a substance other than pus, was equally common in the two groups.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference12 articles.
1. Wound infections after appendicectomy;Andersen;Acta Chir. Scand.,1972
2. The reduction of surgical wound infections by prophylactic parenteral cephaloridine;Evans;Br. J. Surg.,1973
3. The reduction of surgical wound infections by topical cephaloridine: a controlled clinical trial;Evans;Br. J. Surg.,1974
4. Influence of prophylaxis against Bacteroides on incidence of sepsis after large bowel surgery;Keighley;Proc. R. Soc. Med.,1975
5. The effect of blood on disinfection of surgeons' hands;Lowbury;Br. J. Surg.,1974
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献