Prospective randomized study of radical versus four piles haemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic large circumferential prolapsed piles

Abstract

Abstract Twenty-eight patients (14 men, 14 women) with circumferential prolapsed piles were prospectively randomized to undergo either modified radical haemorrhoidectomy (group 1; 14 patients) or four piles haemorrhoidectomy (group 2; 14). The median duration of surgery was 30 and 10min respectively in groups 1 and 2. After operation all patients in group 1 were continent compared with 12 of 14 in group 2. Two patients in group 2 developed an anal stricture requiring manual dilatation. Five patients in group 1 had wound dehiscence requiring secondary suture; three of these developed an anal stricture: two needed anal dilatation and one required anoplasty. Two patients in group 1 had residual anal skin tags, compared with nine in group 2. Two patients in group 2 had symptomatic residual piles, whereas none in group 1 had this problem. At 6 months, six patients in group 2 considered the results to be excellent, seven acceptable and one was disappointed. In group 1 two considered the operation to be excellent, ten acceptable and two were disappointed.