No-Touch isolation technique in colon cancer: A controlled prospective trial

Author:

Wiggers T1,Jeekel J2,Arends J W3,Brinkhorst A P4,Kluck H M5,Luyk C I6,Munting J D K7,Povel J A C M8,Rutten A P M9,Volovics A10,Greep J M1

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Surgery, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

2. University Hospital Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

3. Department of Pathology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

4. Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

5. St. Joseph Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

6. Gregorius de Grote Hospital, Brunssum, The Netherlands

7. De Wever Hospital, Heerlen, The Netherlands

8. St. Barbara Hospital, Geleen, The Netherlands

9. Laurentius Hospital, Roermond, The Netherlands

10. Department of Statistics, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract In order to assess the effect of the no-touch isolation technique, in the treatment of large bowel cancers, on the site of first recurrence and disease-free and overall survival, 236 patients were prospectively and randomly assigned to either the no-touch isolation technique (117 patients) or to a conventional resection technique (119 patients). No patient with distant metastases or unresectable disease entered the study. The two treatment groups were comparable with regard to patient characteristics. Pre- and postoperative complications (including mortality within 30 days) were similar in both groups. After a complete follow-up of 5 years, a tendency for reduction in the number of, and time to, occurrences of liver metastases was seen in the no-touch isolation group (P = 0.14). This effect was most obvious in the sigmoid colon with angio-invasive growth. Overall (P = 0.42) and corrected (P = 0.25) survival did not differ significantly among the treatment groups although in every analysis the survival data of the no-touch isolation group were superior. The data do suggest a limited benefit of the no-touch isolation technique. This observation is important since the morbidity and mortality of surgery were equal in both groups.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Reference42 articles.

1. Adjuvant therapy of colon cancer—results of a prospectivey randomized trial;Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group;N Engl J Med,1984

2. Intracavitary irradiation of early rectal cancer for cure;Papillon;Cancer,1975

3. Prolongation of the disease-free interval in surgically treated rectal carcinoma;Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group;N Engl J Med,1985

4. Trends in survival rates of patients with cancer;Cutler;N Engl J Med,1975

5. Cancer of the colon and rectum: comparison of the results of three groups of surgeons using different techniques;Péloquin;Car. J Surg,1973

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3