An IMRT planning technique for treating whole breast or chest wall with regional lymph nodes on Halcyon and Ethos

Abstract

AbstractPurpose/ObjectiveField size limitations on Halcyon and Ethos treatment machines largely preclude use of the conventional monoisocentric three‐field technique for breast/chest wall and regional lymph nodes. We present an alternative, IMRT‐based planning approach that facilitates treatment on Halcyon and Ethos while preserving plan quality.Materials/MethodsEight breast and regional node cases (four left‐sided, four right‐sided) were planned for an Ethos machine using a 15–17 field IMRT technique. Institutional plan quality metrics for CTV and PTV coverage and OAR sparing were assessed. Five plans (four right‐sided, one left‐sided) were also planned using a hybrid 3D multisocenter technique. CTV coverage and OAR sparing were compared to the IMRT plans. Eclipse scripting tools were developed to aid in beam placement and plan evaluation through a set of dosimetric scorecards, and both are shared publicly.ResultsOn average, the IMRT plans achieved breast CTV and PTV coverage at 50 Gy of 97.9% and 95.7%, respectively. Supraclavicular CTV and PTV coverages at 45 Gy were 100% and 95.5%. Axillary lymph node CTV and PTV coverages at 45 Gy were 100% and 97.1%, and IMN CTV coverage at 45 Gy was 99.2%. Mean ipsilateral lung V20 Gy was 19.3%, and average mean heart dose was 1.6 Gy for right‐sided cases and 3.0 Gy for left‐sided. In comparison to the hybrid 3D plans, IMRT plans achieved higher breast and supraclavicular CTV coverage (99.9% vs. 98.6% and 99.9% vs. 93.4%), higher IMN coverage (99.6% vs. 78.2%), and lower ipsilateral lung V20 Gy (19.6% vs. 28.2%).ConclusionInstitutional plan quality benchmarks were achieved for all eight cases using the IMRT‐based planning approach. The IMRT‐based planning approach offered superior conformity and OAR sparing than a competing hybrid 3D approach.