Stereotypes and unconscious bias in institutional child sexual abuse: Barriers to identification, reporting and prevention

Author:

Arnold Suzanne1,Jeglic Elizabeth L.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Right Approach Sydney Australia

2. Department of Psychology John Jay College of Criminal Justice New York New York USA

Abstract

AbstractChild sexual abuse within institutional settings has been a major concern for governments around the world for many years. Consequently, prevention policies have been developed, and institutional child abuse laws have been strengthened in many jurisdictions. Legislation is important to prevent reoffending, however, the majority of childhood sexual abuse remains unreported and undetected. While awareness of the failings of institutions to properly identify and respond to child abuse has grown in recent years, barriers to reporting institutional abuse remain understudied, impacting the ability to prevent abuse. One possible reason that prevents workers from identifying and reporting child sexual abuse is that their judgements are vulnerable to stereotypes and unconscious biases about who perpetrates and is victimised by sexual crimes and what constitutes warning signs of sexually abusive behaviours. Research in psychology provides key insights into human reasoning processes that can lead to bias, so workers fail to identify, respond and prevent grooming and child abuse in an organisational context. This paper reviews what is known about the development and maintenance of stereotypes and unconscious bias, their role in institutional sexual abuse, and concludes with a discussion of measures that can be taken to mitigate unconscious bias to prevent child abuse.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference96 articles.

1. Audage S.J.(2007).Preventing child sexual abuse in youth‐serving organisations: creating safe stable nurturing relationships and environments. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Centre for Injury Prevention and Control. Available at:https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/preventingchildsexualabuse-a.pdf[Accessed 20th March 2022].

2. Australian Human Rights Commission. (2018).National principles for child safe organizations. Sydney: Australian Human Rights Commission. Available at:https://childsafe.humanrights.gov.au/national-principles/about-national-principles[Accessed 10th March 2022].

3. Australian National University (ANU). (n.d.).Unconscious bias. Available at:http://www.anu.edu.au/files/resource/UnconsciousBias.pdf[Accessed 10th March 2022].

4. The impacts of institutional child sexual abuse: A rapid review of the evidence

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3