Management of unspecified anxiety disorder: Expert consensus

Author:

Sakurai Hitoshi1ORCID,Inada Ken2ORCID,Aoki Yumi3ORCID,Takeshima Masahiro4,Ie Kenya56,Kise Morito7,Yoshida Eriko8,Tsuboi Takashi1,Yamada Hisashi9,Hori Hikaru10,Inada Yasushi11,Shimizu Eiji1213,Mishima Kazuo4,Watanabe Koichiro1,Takaesu Yoshikazu114ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neuropsychiatry Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan

2. Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine Kitasato University Kanagawa Japan

3. Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing St. Luke's International University Tokyo Japan

4. Department of Neuropsychiatry Akita University Graduate School of Medicine Akita Japan

5. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine St. Marianna University School of Medicine Kanagawa Japan

6. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital Kanagawa Japan

7. Centre for Family Medicine Development Japanese Health and Welfare Co‐operative Federation Tokyo Japan

8. Department of General Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Kyodo Hospital Kawasaki Health Cooperative Association Kanagawa Japan

9. Department of Neuropsychiatry Hyogo Medicial University Hyogo Japan

10. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Fukuoka University Fukuoka Japan

11. Medical corporation YUJIN‐KAI Inada Clinic Osaka Japan

12. Research Center for Child Mental Development Chiba University Chiba Japan

13. Department of Cognitive Behavioral Physiology, Graduate School of Medicine Chiba University Chiba Japan

14. Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine University of the Ryukyus Okinawa Japan

Abstract

AbstractAimsTreatment guidelines with respect to unspecified anxiety disorder have not been published. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus among field experts on the management of unspecified anxiety disorder.MethodsExperts were asked to evaluate treatment choices based on eight clinical questions concerning unspecified anxiety disorder using a nine‐point Likert scale (1 = “disagree” to 9 = “agree”). According to the responses from 119 experts, the choices were categorized into first‐, second‐, and third‐line recommendations.ResultsBenzodiazepine anxiolytic use was not categorized as a first‐line recommendation for the primary treatment of unspecified anxiety disorder, whereas multiple nonpharmacological treatment strategies, including coping strategies (7.9 ± 1.4), psychoeducation for anxiety (7.9 ± 1.4), lifestyle changes (7.8 ± 1.5), and relaxation techniques (7.4 ± 1.8), were categorized as first‐line recommendations. Various treatment strategies were categorized as first‐line recommendations when a benzodiazepine anxiolytic drug did not improve anxiety symptoms, that is, differential diagnosis (8.2 ± 1.4), psychoeducation for anxiety (8.0 ± 1.5), coping strategies (7.8 ± 1.5), lifestyle changes (7.8 ± 1.5), relaxation techniques (7.2 ± 1.9), and switching to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (7.0 ± 1.8). These strategies were also highly endorsed when tapering the dosage of or discontinuing benzodiazepine anxiolytic drugs. There was no first‐line recommendation regarding excusable reasons for continuing benzodiazepine anxiolytics.ConclusionsThe field experts recommend that benzodiazepine anxiolytics should not be used as a first‐line option for patients with unspecified anxiety disorder. Instead, several nonpharmacological interventions and switching to SSRIs were endorsed for the primary treatment of unspecified anxiety disorder and as alternatives to benzodiazepine anxiolytics.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Psychiatry and Mental health,Pharmacology,Clinical Psychology

Reference21 articles.

1. Anxiety disorders

2. The German guidelines for the treatment of anxiety disorders

3. World Federation of Societies of biological psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for treatment of anxiety, obsessive‐compulsive and posttraumatic stress disorders ‐ version 3. Part I: anxiety disorders;Bandelow B;World J Biol Psychiatry,2022

4. National Institute for health and clinical excellence (NICE).Generalised anxiety disorder and panic disorder in adults: Management.2011. Available from:https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg113

5. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of panic disorder, social anxiety disorder and generalised anxiety disorder

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3