Use of current automatic smoke evacuation system in flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy: Its feasibility and potential usefulness

Author:

Nose Yohei12ORCID,Kato Motohiko3ORCID,Aoyagi Shoma4,Akeo Kazunori4,Yamashita Kotaro2,Saito Takuro2,Tanaka Koji2,Yamamoto Kazuyoshi2,Makino Tomoki2,Takahashi Tsuyoshi2,Kurokawa Yukinori2,Eguchi Hidetoshi2,Doki Yuichiro2,Nakajima Kiyokazu12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Next Generation Endoscopic Intervention (Project ENGINE) Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University Osaka Japan

2. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka Japan

3. Center for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

4. AMCO Incorporated Tokyo Japan

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesFlexible endoscopy does not have a system that can automatically evacuate surgical smoke generated in the gastrointestinal lumen. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and potential usefulness of automatic smoke evacuation systems in flexible endoscopy.Methods[Bench] After surgical smoke generated in the stomach was evacuated by the evacuator, the degree of residual smoke and gastric luminal collapse were evaluated to optimize the evacuator settings. [Animal] Insufflation, suction, and total operation time to complete the protocol of 10 cauterizations of the gastric mucosa were measured in three groups: “manual suction only,” “manual suction with automatic evacuation (50% force),” and “manual suction with automatic evacuation (70% force).” The stability of endoscopic visualization and operability was evaluated by 10 endoscopists blinded to those suction settings, and the number of manual suctions, insufflations, and total operation time were measured.Results[Bench] The degree of residual smoke and gastric luminal collapse were inversely correlated. [Animal] When the automatic evacuator was partially used, there was no difference in the insufflation time, but the suction time (vs 50%; p = 0.011, vs. 70%; p = 0.011) and total operation time (vs. 50%; p = 0.012, vs. 70%; p = 0.036) were significantly reduced compared to manual operation only. Furthermore, manual suction with automatic evacuation (50% force) significantly improved the stability of endoscopic visualization and operability compared to manual operation only (p = 0.041, p = 0.0085).ConclusionsThe automatic smoke evacuation in flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy was potentially feasible and useful by improving the device setting.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3