Otolaryngologic Side Effects After COVID‐19 Vaccination

Author:

Ahsanuddin Salma1ORCID,Jin Ryan2ORCID,Dhanda Aatin K.2ORCID,Georges Kirolos2ORCID,Baredes Soly2,Eloy Jean Anderson23456ORCID,Fang Christina H.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center Bronx New York USA

2. Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Newark New Jersey USA

3. Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Neurological Institute of New Jersey Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Newark New Jersey USA

4. Department of Neurological Surgery Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Newark New Jersey USA

5. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Newark New Jersey USA

6. Department of Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery Saint Barnabas Medical Center, RWJBarnabas Health Livingston New Jersey USA

Abstract

ObjectivesWith widespread vaccination against COVID‐19, concerns regarding side effects have been raised. We aim to assess the frequency of otolaryngologic adverse events (AEs) following COVID‐19 vaccination as compared with other vaccines in a national database.Study DesignRetrospective analysis of national registry.MethodsThe Food and Drug Administration's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database was queried from December 2020 to May 2021 for all COVID‐19 vaccination AEs. Complaints were categorized as otolaryngologic and sub stratified into different anatomic components. Reporting odds ratios (ROR) and proportional reporting ratios (PRR) were determined for AEs of clinical significance.ResultsThe total number of AEs reported from vaccination with the Moderna, Pfizer‐BioNTech, and Janssen vaccines equaled 1,280,950. Of these, 62,660 (4.9%) were otolaryngologic in nature, with 32.6% associated with the oropharynx/larynx, 18.3% with the nasal cavity/sinuses, 17.1% with the ears/vestibular system, 10.0% with the oral cavity, and 21.9% miscellaneous. Signal ratios reached significance levels for dysgeusia (n = 2124, PRR: 17.33, ROR: 16.36), ageusia (n = 1376, PRR: 2.81, ROR: 2.81), anosmia (n = 983, PRR: 4.01, ROR: 4.01), rhinorrhea (n = 2203, PRR: 2.99, ROR: 3.00), throat tightness (n = 3666, PRR: 4.99, ROR: 5.00), throat irritation (n = 3313, PRR: 4.51, ROR: 4.52), dysphagia (n = 2538, PRR: 2.07, ROR: 2.07), tinnitus (n = 4377, PRR: 3.97, ROR: 3.98), and vertigo (n = 2887, PRR: 3.93, ROR: 3.93). Signal ratios were not significant for facial paralysis, Bell's palsy, anaphylaxis, sinusitis, hearing disability, and ear pain.ConclusionsAlthough several otolaryngologic symptoms were reported, few were found to be clinically significant. Of note, facial paralysis, Bell's palsy, and anaphylaxis did not meet signal thresholds to be determined significant.Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, 2023

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology

Reference46 articles.

1. National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine.National Academies Release Framework for Equitable Allocation of a COVID‐19 Vaccine for Adoption by HHS State Tribal Local and Territorial Authorities. Published October 2 20202020.

2. Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine

3. The Johnson & Johnson Vaccine for COVID-19

4. Comparative Effectiveness of Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech, and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) Vaccines in Preventing COVID-19 Hospitalizations Among Adults Without Immunocompromising Conditions — United States, March–August 2021

5. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3