Intensive glucose control and recurrent cardiovascular events: 14‐year follow‐up investigation of the ACCORDION study

Author:

Kloecker David E.12ORCID,Davies Melanie J.1,Pitocco Dario3ORCID,Khunti Kamlesh12,Zaccardi Francesco12

Affiliation:

1. Diabetes Research Centre Leicester Diabetes Centre Leicester General Hospital Leicester UK

2. Leicester Real World Evidence Unit Leicester Diabetes Centre Leicester General Hospital Leicester UK

3. Diabetes Care Unit Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS Catholic University Rome Roma Italy

Abstract

AbstractAimsWhile cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes commonly progresses with the occurrence of repeated events, most trials consider the effect of glucose‐lowering strategies only on the first event. We examined the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes trial and its observational follow‐up study (ACCORDION) to investigate the effect of intensive glucose control on multiple events and further identify any subgroup effects.Materials and MethodsA recurrent events analysis, using a negative binomial regression model, was applied to estimate the treatment effect on different consecutive cardiovascular disease events, including non‐fatal myocardial infarction, non‐fatal stroke, hospitalisation from heart failure, and cardiovascular death. Interaction terms were used to identify potential effect modifiers. The robustness of the results was confirmed in sensitivity analyses using alternative models.ResultsThe median duration of follow‐up was 7.7 years. Of the 5128 participants in the intensive and 5123 in the standard glucose control arm, respectively, 822 (16.0%) and 840 (16.4%) participants experienced a single event; 189 (3.7%) and 214 (4.2%) participants experienced two events; 52 (1.0%) and 40 (0.8%) experienced three events; and 1 (0.02%) and 1 (0.02%) experienced four events. There was no evidence of a treatment effect, with a rate difference of 0.0 (−0.3, 0.3) per 100 person‐years comparing intensive versus standard intervention, although with non‐significantly lower event rates in younger patients with HbA1c < 7% and higher event rates in older patients with HbA1c ≥ 9%.DiscussionIntensive glucose control may not affect cardiovascular disease progression except in select subgroups. Since time‐to‐first event analysis may miss beneficial or harmful effects of glucose control on the risk of cardiovascular disease, recurrent events analysis should be routinely analysed in cardiovascular outcome trials, particularly when investigating long‐term treatment effects.Clinical trial reg no. NCT00000620, clinicaltrials.gov.

Funder

University of Leicester

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3