Affiliation:
1. School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Science The University of Melbourne Parkville Australia
2. CSIRO, Environment, Waite Campus Adelaide South Australia Australia
3. UniSA STEM University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Campus Mawson Lakes South Australia Australia
4. Esk Spatial Invermay Tasmania Australia
Abstract
AbstractQuantifying water use of various water consumers is an essential part of sustainable water management. Annual evapotranspiration (ET) of plantation forests often exceeds that of dryland agriculture, which in South Africa and South Australia has resulted in restrictions on plantation development. In the latter case, water licences are issued to commercial forestry plantations to account for higher ET compared to dryland pasture. Unlike irrigated crops, it is not practicable to measure water use of plantations directly and so in South Australia a set of ‘deemed’ average water use rates has been applied since 2013, based on species and depth to groundwater. Since South Australia's ‘deemed’ rates were calculated, additional plot‐scale measurements of annual ET from plantations <2 years old and post‐canopy closure have been used to quantify various components of ET. This has enabled development of two empirical ET models for plantations in South Australia's Lower Limestone Coast, and facilitated an advanced understanding of the effect of plantations on hydrological processes, particularly in relation to groundwater use. In this study, we applied these models to estimate rotation‐averaged annual ET and net groundwater impacts (net groundwater extraction plus recharge reduction compared to pasture) of plantations, driven by climate and groundwater depth, for comparison with the deemed rates. The modelling suggests that the groundwater impacts of plantations vary in space and time and that the deemed rates over‐estimate these impacts, on average. Accounting for variation in the effects of climate on the various components of ET, both spatially and temporally, may allow for more flexible rules for water resource allocation than using any simple, rule‐of‐thumb approach.
Funder
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Natural Heritage Trust
Forest and Wood Products Australia
Reference46 articles.
1. Waters and forests: from historical controversy to scientific debate
2. Anonymous. (2004).Intergovernmental Agreement on a National Water Initiative Between the Commonwealth of Australia and the Governments of New South Wales Victoria Queensland South Australia the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory.www.awe.gov.au
3. Benyon R. G. &Doody T. M.(2009).Quantifying groundwater recharge under plantations in south East South Australia. CSIRO: Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship Canberra.www.publications.csiro.au
4. Comparison of interception, forest floor evaporation and transpiration inPinus radiataandEucalyptus globulusplantations
5. Benyon R. G. Doody T. M. Theiveyanathan S. &Koul V.(2009).Plantation forest water use in southwest Victoria. Final report on Project PNC064‐0607 Forest and Wood Products Australia.www.fwpa.com.au