Patients' recall of clinical information following laparoscopy for acute abdominal pain

Author:

Murphy S M1,Donnelly M1,Fitzgerald T2,Tanner W A1,Keane F B V1,Tierney S1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Tallaght, Ireland

2. Haughton Institute, Trinity College Centre for Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland

Abstract

Abstract Background Failures in doctor–patient communication and patients' understanding continue to confound improvements in the delivery of quality healthcare. In the context of acute abdominal pain managed by means of laparoscopy, it was hypothesized that patients are either not adequately informed, or do not reliably retain simple relevant information transmitted at the time of the procedure. This study was designed to evaluate the reliability of information transfer between doctor and patient in this setting, including the diagnosis and whether or not the appendix was removed. Methods A retrospective study of 350 consecutive patients who had undergone laparoscopy for acute abdominal pain over 3·5 years was designed. Each patient completed a telephone questionnaire that was used to evaluate the accuracy of patients' information. Results In total, 26·9 per cent of patients did not know or were incorrect regarding the surgical procedure performed. Similarly, 20·0 per cent of all patients did not know or were incorrect regarding the status of their appendix after surgery and 30·0 per cent of patients were incorrect regarding the diagnosis. Despite all of these statistics, 91·4 per cent of patients were happy with the information they had received regarding the procedure. Conclusion Some 26·9 per cent of patients who underwent laparoscopy for acute abdominal pain were incorrect or did not know about the procedure that had been performed. This could lead to a further unnecessary operation should they re-present with similar symptoms.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3