Affiliation:
1. Unidad de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Meta‐análisis (URSIGET), Vicerrectorado de Investigación Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola Lima Peru
2. Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre Madrid Spain
3. Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) Madrid Spain
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundObservational studies suggest that valvular surgery can reduce mortality in selected patients with infective endocarditis (IE). However, the benefit of this intervention according to frailty levels remains unclear. Our study aims to assess the effect of valvular surgery according to frailty status in this population.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study using the 2016−2019 National Inpatient Sample database. Adult patients with a primary diagnosis of IE were included. Frailty was assessed using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline differences between groups.ResultsA total of 53,275 patients with IE were included, with 18.3% underwent valvular surgery. The median age was 52 (34−68) years, with 41% females. Overall, 42.7% had low risk of frailty, 53.1% intermediate risk, and 4.2% high risk. After IPTW adjustment, in‐hospital mortality was similar both for the entire cohort between valvular and non‐valvular surgery groups (3.7% vs. 4.1%, p = .483), and low (1% vs. 0.9%, p = .952) or moderate (5.4% vs. 6%, p = .548) risk of frailty. However, patients at high risk of frailty had significantly lower in‐hospital mortality in the valvular surgery group (4.6% vs. 13.9%, p = .016). Renal replacement therapy was similar between groups across frailty status. In contrast, surgery was associated with increased use of mechanical circulatory support and pacemaker implantation.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that there was no difference in survival between valve surgery and medical management in patients at low/intermediate frailty risk, but not for high‐risk individuals.