Sex‐specific differences in pain localization in female patients with endometriosis: A comparison of sexless and female human body outlines

Author:

Szczypien Natasza1,Ruchay Zoe2,Ruchay Zino3,Müller Sandra Verena2,Kaiser Claudia2,Klawonn Frank14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Information Engineering, Faculty of Computer Science Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences Wolfenbüttel Germany

2. Faculty of Social Work Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences Wolfenbüttel Germany

3. Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics University Hospital Schleswig‐Holstein (UKSH) Kiel Germany

4. Biostatistics Group, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research Braunschweig Germany

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThis study explores sex‐specific differences in pain localization using pain drawings in female patients with endometriosis. Traditional human body outlines (HBOs) used for pain drawings are often viewed as male, making accurate pain assessment difficult. The study aims to compare pain localization and extent between patients presented with sexless and female HBOs.MethodsA total of 49 female patients with endometriosis completed questionnaires and pain drawings (n = 24 and n = 26 with individually designed sexless and female HBOs, respectively). The Ruzika similarity index was used to investigate potential differences in pain drawings between sexless and female HBOs. Hypothesis testing was applied to compare the number of pixels marked in the pain extents and to investigate the suitability of the presented body outline.ResultsSex of HBOs used in pain drawings had no effect on pain area, and no statistically significant differences were found in pain localization or area between female and sexless outlines. Most, but not all participants found the body outlines suitable.ConclusionsThe findings suggest that differences in the resulting areas marked in the pain drawings were negligible and the preferences for sexless pain drawings were not significant, so that a sexless body outline for pain drawings could be a good choice, especially when a study does not focus on one specific sex.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience

Reference32 articles.

1. Binary versus 5-Point Likert Scale in Assessing Otolaryngology Trainees in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

2. Relationship of pain and ancestry in African American women

3. Bogner K. &Landrock U.(2015).Antworttendenzen in standardisierten Umfragen. Mannheim GESIS—Leibniz Institut für Sozialwissenschaften (SDM Survey Guidelines).https://doi.org/10.15465/sdm‐sg_016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3