Radiation exposure during sacral neuromodulation lead placement: Multi‐institutional descriptive study

Author:

Burns Ramzy T.1ORCID,Orzel Joanna2,Wadensweiler Paul3,Kenne Kimberly4,Nakastuka Hannah5,Kovacevic Natalija6,Aswani Yashant7,Ann Gormley E.8,Padamanabhan Priya6,Powell Charles R.1ORCID,Vollstedt Annah2ORCID,Takacs Elizabeth2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA

2. Department of Urology University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City Iowa USA

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Dartmouth‐Hitchcock Medical Center Lebanon New Hampshire USA

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City Iowa USA

5. Carver College of Medicine Iowa City Iowa USA

6. Department of Urology Beaumont Health Royal Oak Michigan USA

7. Department of Radiology University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City Iowa USA

8. Department of Urology Dartmouth‐Hitchcock Medical Center Lebanon New Hampshire USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesFluoroscopy has significantly improved lead placement and decreased surgical time for implantable sacral neuromodulation (SNM). There is a paucity of data regarding radiation and safety of fluoroscopy during SNM procedures. Our study aims to characterize fluoroscopy time and dose used during SNM surgery across multiple institutions and assess for predictors of increased fluoroscopy time and radiation dose.MethodsElectronic medical records were queried for SNM procedures (Stage 1 and full implant) from 2016 to 2021 at four academic institutions. Demographic, clinical, and intraoperative data were collected, including fluoroscopy time and radiation dose in milligray (mGy). The data were entered into a centralized REDCap database. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to assess for predictive factors using STATA/BE 17.0.ResultsA total of 664 procedures were performed across four institutions. Of these, 363 (54.6%) procedures had complete fluoroscopy details recorded. Mean surgical time was 58.8 min. Of all procedures, 79.6% were performed by Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery specialists. There was significant variability in fluoroscopy time and dose based on surgical specialty and institution. Most surgeons (76.4%) were considered “low volume” implanters. In a multivariate analysis, bilateral finder needle testing, surgical indication, surgeon volume, and institution significantly predicted increased fluoroscopy time and radiation dose (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThere is significant variability in fluoroscopy time and radiation dose utilized during SNM procedures, with differences across institutions, surgeons, and subspecialties. Increased radiation exposure can have harmful impacts on the surgical team and patient. These findings demonstrate the need for standardized fluoroscopy use during SNM procedures.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3