Cross–cultural Generalizability of the Alternative Five–factor Model Using the Zuckerman–Kuhlman–Aluja Personality Questionnaire

Author:

Rossier Jérôme1,Aluja Anton23,Blanch Angel23,Barry Oumar4,Hansenne Michel5,Carvalho André F.6,Valdivia Mauricio7,Wang Wei8,Desrichard Olivier9,Hyphantis Thomas10,Suranyi Zsuzsanna11,Glicksohn Joseph12,De Pascalis Vilfredo13,León–Mayer Elizabeth14,Piskunov Aleksei15,Stivers Adam16,Morizot Julien17,Ostendorf Fritz18,Čekrlija Đorđe19,Bellaj Tarek20,Markiewicz Dorota21,Motevalian Abbas22,Karagonlar Gokhan23

Affiliation:

1. University of Lausanne, Switzerland

2. University of Lleida, Catalonia, Spain

3. Catalonia is a nation with its own culture and language located in Spain.

4. University Cheikh Anta Diop, Senegal

5. University of Liège, Belgium

6. Federal University of Ceará, Brazil

7. Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Chile

8. Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China

9. University of Geneva, Switzerland

10. Medical School of the University of Ioannina, Greece

11. Károli Gáspár University, Hungary

12. Bar-Ilan University, Israel

13. La Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

14. National University of La Plata, Argentina

15. Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russia

16. University of Delaware, DE, USA

17. University of Montreal, Canada

18. University of Bielefeld, Germany

19. University of Banja Luka, Bosnia-Herzegovina

20. University of Tunis, Tunisia

21. University of Warsaw, Poland

22. Iran University of Medical Sciences, Iran

23. Dokuz Eylül University, Turkey

Abstract

Several personality models are known for being replicable across cultures, such as the Five–Factor Model (FFM) or Eysenck's Psychoticism–Extraversion–Neuroticism (PEN) model, and are for this reason considered universal. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the cross–cultural replicability of the recently revised Alternative FFM (AFFM). A total of 15 048 participants from 23 cultures completed the Zuckerman–Kuhlman–Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA–PQ) aimed at assessing personality according to this revised AFFM. Internal consistencies, gender differences and correlations with age were similar across cultures for all five factors and facet scales. The AFFM structure was very similar across samples and can be considered as highly replicable with total congruence coefficients ranging from .94 to .99. Measurement invariance across cultures was assessed using multi–group confirmatory factor analyses, and each higher–order personality factor did reach configural and metric invariance. Scalar invariance was never reached, which implies that culture–specific norms should be considered. The underlying structure of the ZKA–PQ replicates well across cultures, suggesting that this questionnaire can be used in a large diversity of cultures and that the AFFM might be as universal as the FFM or the PEN model. This suggests that more research is needed to identify and define an integrative framework underlying these personality models. Copyright © 2016 European Association of Personality Psychology

Funder

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Social Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3