Real‐world treatment outcomes of medicines used in special situations (off‐label and compassionate use) in oncology and hematology: A retrospective study from a comprehensive cancer institution

Author:

Fontanals Sandra1ORCID,Esteve Anna2ORCID,González Andrea3ORCID,Ibáñez Cristina4ORCID,Martínez Javier5,Mesía Ricard3ORCID,Clopés Ana6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Pharmacy Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)‐Hospitalet, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), School of Medicine Universitat de Barcelona (UB) Barcelona Spain

2. Research Management Unit (Unitat de Gestió de la recerca: UGR), Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Badalona‐Applied Research Group in Oncology (B‐ARGO) Germans Trias I Pujol Research Institute (IGTP) Badalona Spain

3. Medical Oncology Department Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Badalona‐Applied Research Group in Oncology (B‐ARGO) Germans Trias I Pujol Research Institute (IGTP) Badalona Spain

4. Pharmacy Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)‐Hospitalet School of Health Sciences, Blanquerna Ramon Llull University Barcelona Spain

5. Pharmacy Department Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)‐Hospitalet Barcelona Spain

6. Pharmacy Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)‐Hospitalet, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL) School of Health Sciences, Blanquerna Ramon Llull University Barcelona Spain

Abstract

AbstractPurposeMedicines in special situations (MSS) refer to off‐label or to unlicensed drugs under investigation (compassionate use). Our objectives were to evaluate characteristics and to estimate overall survival (OS), event‐free survival (EFS), and the duration of treatment (DT) of MSS used for cancer treatment at a multicentre comprehensive cancer institution.MethodsRetrospective cohort study on adult cancer patients for whom an MSS treatment was requested (January 2011–December 2020). A descriptive analysis was performed and median OS and EFS and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Survival curves were stratified by type of tumor, ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status (PS), age, sex, treatment stage and type of drug (mechanism of action and target).ResultsTreatment was initiated in 2092 episodes (1930 patients) out of 2377 MSS episodes (2189 patients) requested, 33% for hematological treatment and 87% for advanced stage cancer. Median OS (months) was 21.1 (95% CI 19.4–22.7), median EFS was 5.6 (95% CI 5.1–6.0) months, and median DT was 4.5 [0.0; 115.3] months.OS and EFS statistically significantly favored female patients, ECOG PS ≥2 episodes showed worse OS and EFS outcomes (p < 0.0001). Statistically significant differences in survival were found within solid and hematological cancer, disease stage, drug mechanism of action, and type of cancer (p < 0.001) but not for age. Survival outcomes by tumor subtype and drug are presented both globally and separately based on disease stage.ConclusionMSS uses are practiced across almost all cancer types, mostly for advanced disease. ECOG PS ≥2, along with advanced disease, was related to worse survival. Information about real‐world outcomes is valuable and contributes to better decision‐making regarding MSS and our experience in this field could be of interest for other colleagues.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology

Reference45 articles.

1. 2021 FDA approvals of drugs for cancer treatment—the ASCO post.2021.https://ascopost.com/issues/december‐25‐2021/2021‐fda‐approvals‐of‐drugs‐for‐cancer‐treatment/

2. The off-label use of drugs in oncology: a position paper by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)

3. Study on off‐label use of medicinal products in the European Union;Weda M;Eur Union,2017

4. Evaluation of Oncology Drugs at the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration: When Differences Have an Impact on Clinical Practice

5. Off‐label drug information: regulation, distribution, evaluation, and related controversies;Lee VC;P&T,2009

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3