The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors on low PD‐L1 cervical cancer: A meta‐analysis

Author:

Chen Wutao12ORCID,Zhang Nan12,He Zhihong12,Li Qing12,Wang You12,Lou Weihua12,Di Wen123

Affiliation:

1. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, School of Medicine, Renji Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University Shanghai China

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Renji Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University Shanghai China

3. State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer Shanghai China

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimsThe effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in low programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression in cervical cancer (CC) patients remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs in low PD‐L1 expression CC patients.MethodsThe study is an individual patient data (IPD)‐based meta‐analysis. IPD were compiled through KMSubtraction and IPDfromKM methodologies from high‐quality randomized clinical trials and single‐arm studies which reported overall survival (OS) or progression‐free survival (PFS) stratified by PD‐L1 expression. Kaplan−Meier curves and Cox regression analysis were employed to evaluate the survival benefits of ICIs.ResultsA total of eight studies and 1110 cases were included in the analysis. Within the low PD‐L1 expression subgroup, ICI combination therapy, but not ICI monotherapy, demonstrated significant OS benefits over non‐ICI treatment (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36−1.04, p = 0.06). Concerning PFS, ICI monotherapy was associated with a negative effect compared to non‐ICI treatment (HR = 4.59, 95% CI: 2.32−9.07, p < 0.001). Notably, both OS and PFS outcomes were unfavorable for ICI monotherapy compared to both non‐ICI and ICI combination therapy in the combined positive score <1 subgroup (OS: HR = 2.60, 95% CI: 1.31−5.16, p = 0.008; PFS: HR = 7.59, 95% CI: 3.53−16.31, p < 0.001).ConclusionIn patients with CC and low PD‐L1 expression, ICI monotherapy may not be considered as the optimal treatment strategy when compared to non‐ICI treatment or ICI combination therapy.RegistrationCRD42023395103.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3