Comparison of mouse models of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Abstract

AbstractAimsHeart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a leading cause of death worldwide; thus, therapeutic improvements are needed. In vivo preclinical models are essential to identify molecular drug targets for future therapies. Transverse aortic constriction (TAC) is a well‐established model of HFrEF; however, highly experienced personnel are needed for the surgery, and several weeks of follow‐up are necessary to develop HFrEF. To this end, we aimed (i) to develop an easy‐to‐perform mouse model of HFrEF by treating Balb/c mice with angiotensin‐II (Ang‐II) for 2 weeks by minipump and (ii) to compare its cardiac phenotype and transcriptome to the well‐established TAC model of HFrEF in C57BL/6J mice.MethodsMortality and gross pathological data, cardiac structural and functional characteristics assessed by echocardiography and immunohistochemistry and differential gene expression obtained by RNA‐sequencing and gene‐ontology analyses were used to characterize and compare the two models. To achieve statistical comparability between the two models, changes in treatment groups related to the corresponding control were compared (ΔTAC vs. ΔAng‐II).ResultsCompared with the well‐established TAC model, chronic Ang‐II treatment of Balb/c mice shares similarities in cardiac systolic functional decline (left ventricular ejection fraction: −57.25 ± 7.17% vs. −43.68 ± 5.31% in ΔTAC vs. ΔAng‐II; P = 0.1794) but shows a lesser degree of left ventricular dilation (left ventricular end‐systolic volume: 190.81 ± 44.13 vs. 57.37 ± 10.18 mL in ΔTAC vs. ΔAng‐II; P = 0.0252) and hypertrophy (cell surface area: 58.44 ± 6.1 vs. 10.24 ± 2.87 μm2 in ΔTAC vs. ΔAng‐II; P < 0.001); nevertheless, transcriptomic changes in the two HFrEF models show strong correlation (Spearman's r = 0.727; P < 0.001). In return, Ang‐II treatment in Balb/c mice needs significantly less procedural time [38 min, interquartile range (IQR): 31–46 min in TAC vs. 6 min, IQR: 6–7 min in Ang‐II; P < 0.001] and surgical expertise, is less of an object for peri‐procedural mortality (15.8% in TAC vs. 0% in Ang‐II; P = 0.105) and needs significantly shorter follow‐up for developing HFrEF.ConclusionsHere, we demonstrate for the first time that chronic Ang‐II treatment of Balb/c mice is also a relevant, reliable but significantly easier‐to‐perform preclinical model to identify novel pathomechanisms and targets in future HFrEF research.