How healthy are Australian lunch box snacks with child‐directed marketing?

Abstract

AbstractIssue AddressedThe diets of Australian children, including their lunch boxes have a disproportionate amount of discretionary foods. Packaged snacks have marketing directed to both children and parents.MethodsPackaged school lunch box snacks were identified on supermarket websites. Nutrition information and child‐directed and parent‐directed marketing on the package were analysed. The “healthiness” of products was analysed using the Health Star Rating (HSR) (presently on packaging in Australia), two criteria designed for assessing food suitable for marketing to children (the Australian Health Council and the World Health Organization Western Pacific region) and Chilean criteria (used for broad food regulation).ResultsThe average HSR of the 135 products was 2.2% and 79% had a HSR <3.5. About 39% of products had child‐directed marketing. Child‐directed marketing would be removed from 89% sweet snacks, and 91% savoury snacks if products with a HSR <3.5 were not allowed to carry that marketing. This is less than the proportion not allowed using criteria from Chile (100%), World Health Organization Western Pacific Region (99%) and the Australian Health Council (93%).ConclusionsA policy that disallows marketing tactics on unhealthy food based on any of the criteria studied would remove most of both child‐directed and parent‐directed marketing on packaged lunch box snacks.So What?Removing child‐directed marketing from unhealthy products would help parents when shopping and contribute to addressing the high proportion of discretionary foods eaten by children at school. Child‐directed marketing on packaging should be a part of comprehensive regulation to protect children from the marketing of unhealthy foods.