Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous free flap for post‐sacrectomy reconstruction: Outcomes compared with gluteal muscle flap

Author:

Lee Dianne Dong Un1,Park Se‐Jun2,Lee Kyeong‐Tae1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Samsung Medical Centre Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea

2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Center, Samsung Medical Centre Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundExcision of sacral tumor results in extensive defects and vital organ exposure, requiring soft tissue reconstruction for dead space obliteration. Diverse reconstruction options, mainly regional flaps, have been utilized but are limited by high postoperative morbidity. A reliable reconstructive method with low morbidity and facilitated recovery has yet been sought for. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the use of free latissimus dorsi (LD) flap for post‐sacrectomy defect reconstruction by comparing its outcomes with local gluteus maximus (GM) flap.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of all patients with sacral malignancy who underwent partial or total sacrectomy and immediate reconstruction with LD or GM flap between 2013 and 2022. Nineteen patients were analyzed, including 10 GM flaps and nine LD flaps. Postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe average size of LD flaps was 173.8 cm2. Seven patients developed complication in the GM group and two patients in the LD group. Complication rate at sacrectomy site was lower in the LD group (p = .003) showing complication‐free sacrectomy site and two donor site seromas. The LD group resulted in shorter hospital stay (p = .033) and earlier ambulation than the GM group (p = .001). Mean follow‐up period was 63 months for GM group and 17 months for LD group. Three patients in the GM group underwent re‐operation, while no delayed complication was observed in the LD group.ConclusionFree LD flaps may provide reliable outcomes with early recovery and may be considered an effective option for sacrectomy defect reconstruction.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3