Affiliation:
1. College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering Northwest A & F University Yangling China
2. Institute of Hydraulics Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute of Changjiang Water Resources Commission Wuhan China
3. Hubei Key Laboratory of Watershed Water Resources and Ecological Environment Science Wuhan China
4. College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering Yangzhou University Yangzhou China
Abstract
AbstractProjection of future dry‐wet evolution is essential for making long‐term regional climate adaptation strategies. In this study, the projection of regional dry‐wet evolution is conducted with a careful consideration on uncertainty attribution. The Evaporative Stress Index (ESI) is adopted due to its physical mechanisms for taking evaporative demand into account. A three‐dimensional framework is constructed for quantifying the range of uncertainty of the ESI in which six Global Climate Models (GCMs) in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6), three latest Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) scenarios, and six Potential Evapotranspiration Models (PETMs) are used. The framework provides 108 different ESI simulations for two future periods: 2041–2070 (mid‐future) and 2071–2100 (far‐future). An agglomerative‐hierarchical clustering method and the Analysis of Variance methodology are employed to evaluate the relative contribution of each uncertainty source. The region of Northwest China is used as a case to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. The results indicate that most of the parts in Northwest China would experience dry mitigation in both mid‐future and far‐future periods. Projected ESI by PM[CO2] model and ACCESS‐ESM1‐5 suggestes a higher tendency for dry mitigation. Hierarchical clustering analysis of the 108 sets of ESI predictions indicate that most clusters are dominated by GCM forcing, and one cluster is dominated by the SSP1‐2.6 scenario. Furthermore, GCM‐related uncertainty′s relative contribution to the total projection uncertainty is the greatest, with an average value of 49.98% in the far future (i.e., 2071–2100 s). Although the contribution of SSP uncertainty is smaller (21.68%−28.43%), it increases in far‐future over mid‐future. The case study indicates that the large scale ensemble prediction of ESI and its uncertainty analysis provide a more comprehensive data set on climate change and help water managers to gain in‐depth understanding of future trends of drought projections.
Funder
Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Reference51 articles.
1. Evaluation of Drought Indices Based on Thermal Remote Sensing of Evapotranspiration over the Continental United States
2. Evapotranspiration partitioning in CMIP5 models: Uncertainties and implications for simulated climate and projections;Berg A. M.;AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts,2018
3. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization
4. Study on coordination and quantification of ecological protection and high quality development in the Yellow River Basin;Gao H.;IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,2021
5. Reference Crop Evapotranspiration from Temperature
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献