Real time patient‐reported outcome measures in patients with cancer: Early experience within an integrated health system

Author:

Tam Samantha1ORCID,Zatirka Theresa2,Neslund‐Dudas Christine3,Su Wan‐Ting3,Cannella Cara E.3,Grewal Jeewanjot S.1,Mattour Ahmad H.4,Tang Amy3,Movsas Benjamin5,Chang Steven S.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Henry Ford Hospital Detroit Michigan USA

2. Division of Clinical and Quality Transformation, Transformation Consulting Henry Ford Health Detroit Michigan USA

3. Department of Public Health Sciences Henry Ford Health Detroit Michigan USA

4. Department of Hematology‐Oncology Henry Ford Health Detroit Michigan USA

5. Department of Radiation Oncology Henry Ford Hospital Detroit Michigan USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWhile patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) have benefit in cancer clinical trials, real‐world applications are lacking. This study describes the method of implementation of a cancer enterprise‐wide PROMs platform.MethodsAfter establishing a multispecialty stakeholder group within a large integrated health system, domain‐specific instruments were selected from the National Institutes of Health's Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments (pain interference, fatigue, physical function, and depression) and were administered at varying frequencies throughout each patient's cancer journey. All cancer patients with an oncologic visit were eligible to complete the PROMs prior to the visit using a patient portal, or at the time of the visit using a tablet. PROMs were integrated into clinical workflow. Clinical partnerships were essential for successful implementation. Descriptive preliminary data were compared using multivariable logistic regression to determine the factors associated with method of PROMs completion.ResultsFrom September 16, 2020 to July 23, 2021, 23 of 38 clinical units (60.5%) implemented PROMs over 2392 encounters and 1666 patients. Approximately one third of patients (n = 629, 37.8%) used the patient portal. Black patients (aOR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51–0.97) and patients residing in zip codes with higher percentage of unemployment (aOR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01–0.41) were among the least likely to complete PROMs using the patient portal.ConclusionsSuccessful system‐wide implementation of PROMs among cancer patients requires engagement from multispecialty stakeholders and investment from clinical partners. Attention to the method of PROMs collection is required in order to reduce the potential for disparities, such as Black populations and those residing in areas with high levels of unemployment.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3