Affiliation:
1. Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine National Cheng Kung University Tainan Taiwan
2. Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine National Cheng Kung University Tainan Taiwan
3. Department of Pharmacy, College of Medicine National Cheng Kung University Tainan Taiwan
4. Department of Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine National Cheng Kung University Tainan Taiwan
5. Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology Yale University School of Public Health New Haven Connecticut USA
6. Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundResearchers have not simultaneously compared the cost‐effectiveness of six immunotherapies with chemotherapy for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer. This study evaluated the cost‐effectiveness across different programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) levels.MethodsA Markov model with lifetime horizon was created for seven regimens: pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (pembro‐chemo), nivolumab plus ipilimumab (nivo‐ipi), nivolumab, ipilimumab plus chemotherapy (nivo‐ipi‐chemo), atezolizumab plus chemotherapy (atezo‐chemo), atezolizumab, bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (atezo‐beva‐chemo), single‐agent pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy alone. Input parameters were derived from trial data, a network meta‐analysis, and other literature. We conducted the analysis from the perspective of US health care sector.ResultsFor all patients without considering PD‐L1 expression, the incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) of pembro‐chemo versus chemotherapy was $183,299 per quality‐adjusted life year (QALY). The preferred regimens based on ICERs differed by PD‐L1 levels. For patients with PD‐L1 ≥50%, pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy and pembro‐chemo versus pembrolizumab resulted in ICERs of $96,189 and $198,913 per QALY, respectively. The other strategies were dominated. For patients with PD‐L1 of 1%–49%, the ICER of pembro‐chemo comparing to chemotherapy was $218,159 per QALY. The other regimens were dominated by pembro‐chemo. For patients with PD‐L1 <1%, nivo‐ipi versus chemotherapy and nivo‐ipi‐chemo versus nivo‐ipi resulted in ICERs of $161,277 and $881,975 per QALY, and the other regimens were dominated strategies. At the willingness‐to‐pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY, pembrolizumab had 87% and pembro‐chemo had 1% probabilities being cost‐effective in patients with PD‐L1 ≥50% and 1%–49%, respectively. Nivo‐ipi had a 34% probability being cost‐effective in patients with PD‐L1 <1%.ConclusionsThe PD‐L1 level should be incorporated into treatment decision‐making. Our findings suggest that first‐line pembrolizumab, pembro‐chemo, and nivo‐ipi are the preferred strategies for patients with PD‐L1 ≥50%, 1%–49%, and <1%, respectively.
Funder
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
National Cheng Kung University Hospital
Subject
Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology