Cost‐effectiveness of first‐line immunotherapies for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer

Author:

Yang Szu‐Chun1ORCID,Ou Huang‐Tz23ORCID,Su Wu‐Chou4,Wang Shi‐Yi56ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine National Cheng Kung University Tainan Taiwan

2. Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine National Cheng Kung University Tainan Taiwan

3. Department of Pharmacy, College of Medicine National Cheng Kung University Tainan Taiwan

4. Department of Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine National Cheng Kung University Tainan Taiwan

5. Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology Yale University School of Public Health New Haven Connecticut USA

6. Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundResearchers have not simultaneously compared the cost‐effectiveness of six immunotherapies with chemotherapy for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer. This study evaluated the cost‐effectiveness across different programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) levels.MethodsA Markov model with lifetime horizon was created for seven regimens: pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (pembro‐chemo), nivolumab plus ipilimumab (nivo‐ipi), nivolumab, ipilimumab plus chemotherapy (nivo‐ipi‐chemo), atezolizumab plus chemotherapy (atezo‐chemo), atezolizumab, bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (atezo‐beva‐chemo), single‐agent pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy alone. Input parameters were derived from trial data, a network meta‐analysis, and other literature. We conducted the analysis from the perspective of US health care sector.ResultsFor all patients without considering PD‐L1 expression, the incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) of pembro‐chemo versus chemotherapy was $183,299 per quality‐adjusted life year (QALY). The preferred regimens based on ICERs differed by PD‐L1 levels. For patients with PD‐L1 ≥50%, pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy and pembro‐chemo versus pembrolizumab resulted in ICERs of $96,189 and $198,913 per QALY, respectively. The other strategies were dominated. For patients with PD‐L1 of 1%–49%, the ICER of pembro‐chemo comparing to chemotherapy was $218,159 per QALY. The other regimens were dominated by pembro‐chemo. For patients with PD‐L1 <1%, nivo‐ipi versus chemotherapy and nivo‐ipi‐chemo versus nivo‐ipi resulted in ICERs of $161,277 and $881,975 per QALY, and the other regimens were dominated strategies. At the willingness‐to‐pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY, pembrolizumab had 87% and pembro‐chemo had 1% probabilities being cost‐effective in patients with PD‐L1 ≥50% and 1%–49%, respectively. Nivo‐ipi had a 34% probability being cost‐effective in patients with PD‐L1 <1%.ConclusionsThe PD‐L1 level should be incorporated into treatment decision‐making. Our findings suggest that first‐line pembrolizumab, pembro‐chemo, and nivo‐ipi are the preferred strategies for patients with PD‐L1 ≥50%, 1%–49%, and <1%, respectively.

Funder

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

National Cheng Kung University Hospital

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3