Identification of Euphorbiae pekinensis Radix and its counterfeit and adulterated products based on DNA barcode, UPLC‐Q‐TOF‐MS, UPLC fingerprint, and chemometrics

Abstract

AbstractEuphorbiae pekinensis Radix (EPR) is a traditional Chinese herb commonly used to treat edema, pleural effusion, and ascites. However, counterfeit and adulterated products often appear in the market because of the homonym phenomenon, similar appearance, and artificial forgery of Chinese herbs. This study comprehensively evaluated the quality of EPR using multiple methods. The DNA barcode technique was used to identify EPR, while the UPLC‐Q‐TOF‐MS technique was utilized to analyze the chemical composition of EPR. A total of 15 tannin and phenolic acid components were identified. Furthermore, UPLC fingerprints of EPR and its common counterfeit products were established, and unsupervised and supervised pattern recognition models were developed using these fingerprints. The backpropagation artificial neural network and counter‐propagation artificial neural network models accurately identified counterfeit and adulterated products, with a counterfeit ratio of more than 25%. Finally, the contents of the chemical markers 3,3′‐di‐O‐methyl ellagic acid‐4′‐O‐β‐D‐glucopyranoside, ellagic acid, 3,3′‐di‐O‐methyl ellagic acid‐4′‐O‐β‐d‐xylopyranoside, and 3,3′‐di‐O‐methyl ellagic acid were determined to range from 0.05% to 0.11%, 1.95% to 8.52%, 0.27% to 0.86%, and 0.10% to 0.42%, respectively. This proposed strategy offers a general procedure for identifying Chinese herbs and distinguishing between counterfeit and adulterated products.