Critical considerations for communicating environmental DNA science

Author:

Stein Eric D.1ORCID,Jerde Christopher L.2ORCID,Allan Elizabeth Andruszkiewicz3ORCID,Sepulveda Adam J.4ORCID,Abbott Cathryn L.5,Baerwald Melinda R.6ORCID,Darling John7ORCID,Goodwin Kelly D.8ORCID,Meyer Rachel S.9ORCID,Timmers Molly A.1011ORCID,Thielen Peter M.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Costa Mesa California USA

2. Marine Science Institute, University of California Santa Barbara Santa Barbara California USA

3. School of Marine and Environmental Affairs University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

4. U.S. Geological Survey Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center Bozeman Montana USA

5. Fisheries and Oceans Canada Nanaimo British Columbia Canada

6. Division of Integrated Science and Engineering California Department of Water Resources West Sacramento California USA

7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Genomics Branch, Watershed and Ecosystem Characterization Division Research Triangle Park North Carolina USA

8. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA Ocean Exploration, Stationed at SWFSC/NMFS La Jolla California USA

9. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Santa Cruz Santa Cruz California USA

10. Pristine Seas, National Geographic Society Washington DC USA

11. Hawai‘i Institute of Marine Biology, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Honolulu Hawaii USA

12. Research and Exploratory Development Department Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel Maryland USA

Abstract

AbstractThe economic and methodological efficiencies of environmental DNA (eDNA) based survey approaches provide an unprecedented opportunity to assess and monitor aquatic environments. However, instances of inadequate communication from the scientific community about confidence levels, knowledge gaps, reliability, and appropriate parameters of eDNA‐based methods have hindered their uptake in environmental monitoring programs and, in some cases, has created misperceptions or doubts in the management community. To help remedy this situation, scientists convened a session at the Second National Marine eDNA Workshop to discuss strategies for improving communications with managers. These include articulating the readiness of different eDNA applications, highlighting the strengths and limitations of eDNA tools for various applications or use cases, communicating uncertainties associated with specified uses transparently, and avoiding the exaggeration of exploratory and preliminary findings. Several key messages regarding implementation, limitations, and relationship to existing methods were prioritized. To be inclusive of the diverse managers, practitioners, and researchers, we and the other workshop participants propose the development of communication workflow plans, using RACI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) charts to clarify the roles of all pertinent individuals and parties and to minimize the chance for miscommunications. We also propose developing decision support tools such as Structured Decision‐Making (SDM) to help balance the benefits of eDNA sampling with the inherent uncertainty, and developing an eDNA readiness scale to articulate the technological readiness of eDNA approaches for specific applications. These strategies will increase clarity and consistency regarding our understanding of the utility of eDNA‐based methods, improve transparency, foster a common vision for confidently applying eDNA approaches, and enhance their benefit to the monitoring and assessment community.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference76 articles.

1. Beyond Biodiversity: Can Environmental DNA (eDNA) Cut It as a Population Genetics Tool?

2. Combining sampling gear to optimally inventory species highlights the efficiency of eDNA metabarcoding

3. Ausubel J. H. Stoeckle M. Y. &Gaffney P.(2019).Final Report First National Conference on Marine Environmental DNA.https://phe.rockefeller.edu/barcode/blog/wp‐content/uploads/2019/01/MURU‐eDNA‐Conference‐final‐report.pdf

4. Translational Molecular Ecology in practice: Linking DNA-based methods to actionable marine environmental management

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3