Comparison of Reduced and Full Field of View in Diffusion‐Weighted MRI on Image Quality: A Meta‐Analysis

Author:

Shi Jingjing12,Lin Jie12,Zhou Xinbin23,Yin Ningbo2,Wu Liyi2,Yu Mei4,Xu Maosheng12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine) Hangzhou China

2. The First School of Clinical Medicine of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Hangzhou China

3. Department of Cardiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine) Hangzhou China

4. The Xiaoshan Hospital Affiliated of Wenzhou Medical University, Xiaoshan First People's Hospital Hangzhou China

Abstract

BackgroundReduced field of view (rFOV) diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) in MRI shows potential for enhanced image quality compared with traditional full field of view (fFOV) DWI. Evaluating rFOV DWI's impact on image quality is important for clinical adoption.ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy of rFOV DWI in improving image quality, focusing on artifact reduction, signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) improvement, and lesion detectability.Study TypeMeta‐analysis.PopulationSystematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science ending in January 2024. Thirteen studies with 765 participants focusing on DWI quality using rFOV was analyzed.Field Strength/SequenceSS‐EPI, Rtr‐SS‐EPI, 2D‐SS‐EPI at 3.0 T.AssessmentTwo investigators performed the data extraction. QUADAS‐2 assessed bias. The image quality assessment of rFOV and fFOV DWI were compared.Statistical TestsStandardized mean difference (SMD) was utilized to evaluate and standardize MRI image quality. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic and publication bias was evaluated with Egger's test.ResultsThe QUADAS‐2 analysis revealed that most studies exhibited a low risk of bias and minimal concerns regarding applicability. Statistical analysis indicated that rFOV DWI yielded higher subjective image quality scores (SMD = 0.535, 95% CI: 0.339, 0.731, I2 = 45.7%) compared with fFOV DWI and was more effective in reducing artifacts (SMD = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.209, 0.672, I2 = 42.3%) than fFOV DWI. However, a decrease in SNR was noted with rFOV DWI (SMD = −0.670, 95% CI: −1.187 to −0.152, I2 = 87.9%). Additionally, rFOV DWI demonstrated enhancements in lesion visibility (SMD = 0.432, 95% CI: −1.187, −0.152, I2 = 53.1%) and anatomical details (SMD = 0.598, 95% CI: 0.121, 1.075, I2 = 90.8%).Data ConclusionrFOV DWI enhances MRI image quality by reducing artifacts and improving lesion visibility with a SNR trade‐off.Evidence Level3Technical EfficacyStage 1

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3