Generalizing Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Physis and Metaphysis

Author:

Luo Katherine L.1ORCID,Santos Laura2,Tokaria Rumana2,Jambawalikar Sachin2,Duong Phuong T.2ORCID,Raya José G.3ORCID,Mostoufi‐Moab Sogol4,Jaramillo Diego2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

2. Department of Radiology Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USA

3. New York University Langone Medical Center New York New York USA

4. Children's Hospital of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

BackgroundCurrent methods to predict height potential are inaccurate. Predicting height by using MRI of the physeal cartilage has shown promise but the applicability of this technique in different imaging setups has not been well‐evaluated.PurposeTo assess variability in diffusion tensor imaging of the physis and metaphysis (DTI‐P/M) of the distal femur between different scanners, imaging parameters, tractography software, and resolution.Study TypeProspective.Population/SubjectsEleven healthy subjects (five males and six females ages 10–16.94).Field Strength/Sequence3 T; DTI single shot echo planar sequences.AssessmentPhyseal DTI tract measurements of the distal femur were compared between different scanners, imaging parameters, tractography settings, interpolation correction, and tractography software.Statistical TestsBland–Altman, Spearman correlation, linear regression, and Shapiro–Wilk tests. Threshold for statistical significance was set at P = 0.05.ResultsDTI tract values consistently showed low variability with different imaging and analysis settings. Vendor to vendor comparison exhibited strong correlation (ρ = 0.93) and small but significant bias (bias −5.76, limits of agreement [LOA] −24.31 to 12.78). Strong correlation and no significant difference were seen between technical replicates of the General Electric MRI scanner (ρ = 1, bias 0.17 [LOA −1.5 to 1.2], P = 0.42) and the Siemens MRI scanner (ρ = 0.89, bias = 0.56, P = 0.71). Different voxel sizes (1 × 1 × 2 mm3 vs. 2 × 2 × 3 mm3) did not significantly affect DTI values (bias = 1.4 [LOA −5.7 to 8.4], P = 0.35) but maintained a strong correlation (ρ = 0.82). Gap size (0 mm vs. 0.6 mm) significantly affects tract volume (bias = 1.8 [LOA −5.4 to 1.8]) but maintains a strong correlation (ρ = 0.93). Comparison of tractography algorithms generated significant differences in tract number, length, and volume while maintaining correlation (ρ = 0.86, 0.99, 0.93, respectively). Comparison of interobserver variability between different tractography software also revealed significant differences while maintaining high correlation (ρ = 0.85–0.98).Data ConclusionDTI of the pediatric physis cartilage shows high reproducibility between different imaging and analytic parameters.Evidence Level2Technical EfficacyStage 1

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Society for Pediatric Radiology

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3