A framework for synthesizing intervention evidence from multiple sources into a single certainty of evidence rating: Methodological developments from a <scp>US</scp> National Academies of <scp>S</scp> ciences, <scp>E</scp> ngineering, and <scp>M</scp> edicine <scp>C</scp> ommittee-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A framework for synthesizing intervention evidence from multiple sources into a single certainty of evidence rating: Methodological developments from a US National Academies of S ciences, E ngineering, and M edicine C ommittee

Published:2022-07-04 Issue:1 Volume:14 Page:36-51
ISSN:1759-2879
Container-title:Research Synthesis Methods
language:en
Short-container-title:Research Synthesis Methods

Author:

Calonge Ned¹²^ORCID,Shekelle Paul G.³⁴,Owens Douglas K.⁵,Teutsch Steven⁶,Downey Autumn⁷,Brown Lisa⁷,Noyes Jane⁸^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Family Medicine University of Colorado School of Medicine, Colorado School of Public Health Aurora Colorado USA

2. Department of Epidemiology Colorado School of Public Health Aurora Colorado USA

3. General Internal Medicine Division Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center Los Angeles California USA

4. Department of Medicine University of California Los Angeles California USA

5. Department of Health Policy School of Medicine, Freeman‐Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University Palo Alto California USA

6. Department of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles; and Senior Fellow, Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health, Policy and Economics University of Southern California California Los Angeles USA

7. National Academies for Science, Engineering and Medicine Washington Washington, District of Columbia USA

8. Department of Health and Social Care Services Research and Child Health, School of Medical and Health Sciences Bangor University Bangor Wales UK

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Education

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jrsm.1582

Reference42 articles.

1. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews—paper 1: an introduction to a series of articles that provide guidance and tools for reviews of complex interventions

2. Developing an evidence-based guide to community preventive services—methods11Some of this material has been previously published in: Shefer A, Briss P, Rodewald L, et al. Improving immunization coverage rates: An evidence-based review of the literature. Epidemiologic Reviews 1999;20:96–142.22The names and affiliations of the Task Force members are listed on page v of this supplement and at http://www.thecommunityguide.org

3. Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods

4. Complex interventions and their implications for systematic reviews: a pragmatic approach

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A bespoke rapid evidence review process engaging stakeholders for supporting evolving and time-sensitive policy and clinical decision-making: reflection and lessons learned from the Wales Covid-19 Evidence Centre 2021-23;2024-01-23

2. Centering Racial Health Equity in Systematic Reviews Paper 6: Engaging racially and ethnically diverse stakeholders in evidence syntheses;SSRN Electronic Journal;2024

3. Association of Promoting Housing Affordability and Stability With Improved Health Outcomes;JAMA Network Open;2022-11-02