A comparative analysis of the HUGO<sup>TM</sup> robot‐assisted surgery system and the Da Vinci<sup>®</sup> Xi surgical system for robot‐assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse treatment-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A comparative analysis of the HUGO^TM robot‐assisted surgery system and the Da Vinci^® Xi surgical system for robot‐assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse treatment

Published:2023-10-20 Issue:1 Volume:20 Page:
ISSN:1478-5951
Container-title:The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:Robotics Computer Surgery

Author:

Collà Ruvolo Claudia¹²³^ORCID,Afonina Margarita¹²⁴⁵,Balestrazzi Eleonora¹²⁵,Paciotti Marco¹²⁶,Piro Adele¹²⁷,Piramide Federico¹²⁸,Bravi Carlo Andrea¹²⁹,Peraire Lores Maria¹²,Sorce Gabriele¹²¹⁰,Belmonte Mario¹²¹¹,Rebuffo Silvia¹²¹²,Ticonosco Marco¹²⁷,Frego Nicola¹²⁶,Gaia Giorgia⁴,De Groote Ruben¹,Mottrie Alexandre¹²,De Naeyer Geert¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology Onze‐Lieve‐Vrouwziekenhuis Aalst Belgium

2. ORSI Academy Ghent Belgium

3. Department of Neurosciences Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology School of Medicine University of Naples “Federico II” Naples Italy

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology San Paolo Hospital Medical School University of Milan Milan Italy

5. Division of Urology IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di Bologna Bologna Italy

6. Department of Urology Humanitas Research Hospital‐ IRCCS Rozzano Italy

7. Department of Urology Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S.Agostino Estense Modena University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Modena Italy

8. Department of Oncology Division of Urology University of Turin San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital Turin Italy

9. Department of Urology The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust London UK

10. Unit of Urology Division of Experimental Oncology Urological Research Institute IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Vita‐Salute San Raffaele University Milan Italy

11. Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine University of Florence Florence Italy

12. Department of Urology Policlinico San Martino Hospital University of Genova Genova Italy

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWe aimed to compare the outcomes of Robot‐assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) performed using the novel HUGOTM Robot‐Assisted Surgery (RAS) System with the Da Vinci® Xi surgical system.MethodsData from 38 women undergoing RASC for a ≥ 2‐grade pelvic organ prolapse were collected (2021–2023).ResultsOverall, 23 (60.5%) and 15 (39.5%) procedures were performed using the DaVinci® Xi and the HUGOTM RAS system, respectively. The median total operative time was 123 (IQR:106.5–140.5) minutes for the DaVinci® Xi versus 120 (IQR:120–146) minutes for the HUGOTM RAS cases (p = 0.5). No conversion to open/laparoscopic surgery, perioperative complications, or system failures occurred. No differences were recorded according to day of catheter removal and length of stay.ConclusionsThis study represents the first worldwide comparison of RASC executed using the HUGOTM RAS versus the Da Vinci® Xi System. Our data suggest that RASC might be performed with both robotic platforms with similar perioperative outcomes.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Biophysics,Surgery

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/rcs.2587

Reference22 articles.

1. Potential Contenders for the Leadership in Robotic Surgery

2. Prevalence and Trends of Symptomatic Pelvic Floor Disorders in U.S. Women

3. Lifetime Risk of Undergoing Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

4. Robotic Sacral Colpopexy Using Autologous Fascia Lata Compared with Mesh

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Evaluation of Clinical Research on Novel Multiport Robotic Platforms for Urological Surgery According to the IDEAL Framework: A Systematic Review of the Literature;European Urology Open Science;2024-09

2. Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy with Hugo™ RAS versus daVinci Surgical Platform: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2024-05-28

3. Intraoperative Performance of DaVinci Versus Hugo RAS During Radical Prostatectomy: Focus on Timing, Malfunctioning, Complications, and User Satisfaction in 100 Consecutive Cases (the COMPAR-P Trial);European Urology Open Science;2024-05

4. Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty with HUGO™ Robotic System: Initial Experience and Optimal Surgical Set-Up at a Tertiary Referral Robotic Center;Journal of Endourology;2024-04-01

5. A narrative review of the Medtronic Hugo RAS and technical comparison with the Intuitive da Vinci robotic surgical system;Journal of Robotic Surgery;2024-02-28