Technical note: Clinical evaluation of a newly released surface‐guided radiation therapy system on DIBH for left breast radiation therapy

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIt has been shown that a significant reduction of mean heart dose and left anterior descending artery (LAD) dose can be achieved through the use of DIBH for left breast radiation therapy. Surface‐guided DIBH has been widely adopted during the last decade, and there are mainly three commercially available SGRT systems. The reports of the performance of a newly released SGRT system for DIBH application are currently very limited.PurposeTo evaluate the clinical performance of a newly released SGRT system on DIBH for left breast radiation therapy.MethodsTwenty‐five left breast cancer patients treated with DIBH utilizing Varian's Identify system were included (total 493‐fraction treatments). Four aspects of the clinical performance were evaluated: Identify offsets of free breathing post patient setup from tattoos, Identify offsets during DIBH, Identify agreement with radiographic ports during DIBH, and DIBH reference surface re‐capture post patient shifts. The systematic and random errors of free breathing Identify offsets post patient setup were calculated for each patient, as well as for offsets during DIBH. Radiographic ports were taken when the patient's DIBH position was within the clinical tolerance of (± 0.3 cm, ± 30), and these were then compared with treatment field DRRs. If the ports showed that the patient alignment did not agree with the DRRs within 3 mm, a patient shift was performed. A new reference surface was captured and verification ports were taken.ResultsThe all‐patient average systematic and random errors of Identify offsets for free breathing were within (0.4 cm, 1.50) post tattoo setup. The maximum per‐patient systematic and random errors were (1.1 cm, 6.20) and (0.9 cm, 20), and the maximum amplitude of Identify offsets were (2.59 cm, 90). All 493‐fraction DIBH treatments were delivered and successfully guided by the Identify SGRT system. The systematic and random errors of Identify offsets for DIBH were within (0.2 cm, 2.30). Seven patients needed re‐captured surface references due to surface variation or position shifts based on the ports. All patient DIBH verification ports guided by Identify were approved by attending physicians.ConclusionThis evaluation showed that the Identify system performed effectively for surface‐guided patient setup and surface‐guided DIBH imaging and treatment delivery. The feature of color‐coded real‐time patient surface matching feedback facilitated the evaluation of the patient alignment accuracy and the adjustment of the patient position to match the reference.