Research diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Donaghy Paul C1ORCID,Carrarini Claudia23,Ferreira Daniel45,Habich Annegret46,Aarsland Dag78,Babiloni Claudio910,Bayram Ece11,Kane Joseph PM12,Lewis Simon JG13,Pilotto Andrea14,Thomas Alan J1,Bonanni Laura15,

Affiliation:

1. Translational and Clinical Research Institute Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne UK

2. Department of Neuroscience Catholic University of Sacred Heart Rome Italy

3. IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana Rome Italy

4. Division of Clinical Geriatrics Center for Alzheimer Research Department of Neurobiology Care Sciences and Society Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

5. Department of Radiology Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA

6. University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University of Bern Bern Switzerland

7. Department of Old Age Psychiatry Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London London UK

8. Centre for Age‐Related Diseases Stavanger University Hospital Stavanger Norway

9. Department of Physiology and Pharmacology “Vittorio Erspamer” Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy

10. Hospital San Raffaele of Cassino Cassino Italy

11. Parkinson and Other Movement Disorders Center Department of Neurosciences University of California San Diego California USA

12. Centre for Public Health Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK

13. Brain and Mind Centre School of Medical Sciences University of Sydney Sydney Australia

14. Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Neurology Unit University of Brescia Brescia Italy

15. Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti‐Pescara Chieti Italy

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionOperationalized research criteria for mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI‐LB) were published in 2020. The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to review the evidence for the diagnostic clinical features and biomarkers in MCI‐LB set out in the criteria.MethodsMEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase were searched on 9/28/22 for relevant articles. Articles were included if they presented original data reporting the rates of diagnostic features in MCI‐LB.ResultsFifty‐seven articles were included. The meta‐analysis supported the inclusion of the current clinical features in the diagnostic criteria. Evidence for striatal dopaminergic imaging and meta‐iodobenzylguanidine cardiac scintigraphy, though limited, supports their inclusion. Quantitative electroencephalogram (EEG) and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) show promise as diagnostic biomarkers.DiscussionThe available evidence largely supports the current diagnostic criteria for MCI‐LB. Further evidence will help refine the diagnostic criteria and understand how best to apply them in clinical practice and research.Highlights A meta‐analysis of the diagnostic features of MCI‐LB was carried out. The four core clinical features were more common in MCI‐LB than MCI‐AD/stable MCI. Neuropsychiatric and autonomic features were also more common in MCI‐LB. More evidence is needed for the proposed biomarkers. FDG‐PET and quantitative EEG show promise as diagnostic biomarkers in MCI‐LB.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Neurology (clinical),Developmental Neuroscience,Health Policy,Epidemiology

Reference90 articles.

1. The London memory service audit and quality improvement programme

2. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's;Albert MS;Association,2011

3. Research criteria for the diagnosis of prodromal dementia with Lewy bodies

4. Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas

5. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP Case Control Study Checklist.2018.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3