Affiliation:
1. Department of Physical Therapy Winston‐Salem State University Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA
2. Department of Physical Therapy McKell Therapy Group, LLC Provo Utah USA
Abstract
ObjectivesEvaluate diagnostic accuracy of median nerve cross‐sectional area (CSA) to determine severity versus presence of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) across existing electrodiagnostic‐based (EDX) classification systems in patients with type 2 diabetes or bifid anatomy.MethodsRetrospective analysis of cross‐sectional patient data. Receiver operating characteristic analysis used to determine median nerve CSA cutoff values and associated diagnostic likelihood ratios for all consolidated and binary EDX‐based classifications of CTS in patients with type 2 diabetes or bifid anatomy. Determine shifts in diagnostic probability based on established cutoff values and associated likelihood ratios. Distal CSA measured at or near carpal tunnel inlet, proximal CSA at level of pronator quadratus muscle, and delta CSA by subtracting proximal from distal.ResultsBinary categorizations of CTS were statistically superior to consolidated categorizations of CTS severity in patients with type 2 diabetes or bifid anatomy. Binary categorizations established reasonably consistent median nerve CSA cutoff values across all EDX‐based classifications examined resulting in the following for distal CSA or delta CSA: ≤10 or ≤4 mm2 to rule out and ≥11 or ≥5 mm2 to rule in CTS, respectively. These cutoff values resulted in small shifts in diagnostic probability in patients with type 2 diabetes and small to conclusive shifts in diagnostic probability in patients with bifid anatomy.ConclusionsBinary categorizations to rule out or rule in CTS based on the proposed cutoff values provide the most meaningful information about shifts in diagnostic probability across all EDX‐based classifications examined. The use of median nerve CSA to categorize severity of CTS is not recommended in patients with type 2 diabetes or bifid anatomy.