The impact of psychological distress, socio‐demographic and work‐related factors on coping strategies used by nurses during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A cross‐sectional study

Author:

Rahmani Farnaz1ORCID,Ranjbar Fatemeh2,Asghari Elnaz3,Gholizadeh Leila4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Social Determinants of Health Research Center Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran

2. Research Center of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran

3. Department of Medical‐Surgical Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran

4. Faculty of Health University of Technology Sydney New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimThis study aimed to determine factors associated with coping strategies used by nursing staff during the COVID‐19 pandemic in Iran.DesignCross‐sectional study.MethodsA convenience sample of 365 nurses were selected from referral hospitals for COVID‐19 patients in Tabriz, Iran between February 2022 and July 2022. An online self‐administered questionnaire was distributed through social media platforms, including WhatsApp and Instagram. The survey package included a modified Brief COPE scale, socio‐demographic and work‐related questions, and a measure of psychological distress. Multiple regression analysis examined associated factors with coping strategies in SPSS. The study adhered to the STROBE guidelines for reporting.ResultsThe mean age of participants was 31.2 (7.3) years old. Of the 365 participants, 209 (58.9%) used maladaptive coping strategies, and 214 (57.6%) reported experiencing psychological distress. Psychological distress was the strongest predictor of maladaptive coping strategies (β = 4.473, p < 0.001). Female nurses (β = 3.259, p < 0.05), nurses who were under 35 years of age (β = 3.214, p < 0.05), nurses with fewer than ten years of experience (β = 2.416, p < 0.001), those who worked in COVID‐19 ICUs (β = 4.321, p < 0.001), floor nurses (β = 2.344, p < 0.001), and those who worked two or more years in COVID‐19 settings (β = 3.293, p < 0.001) had higher mean scores in maladaptive coping strategies.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contributions.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3