Dose and organ displacement comparisons with breast conservative radiotherapy using abdominal and thoracic deep‐inspiration breath‐holds: A comparative dosimetric study

Author:

Matsumoto Yoshitsugu1,Kunieda Etsuo1,Futakami Natsumi2,Akiba Takeshi2,Nagao Ryuta1,Fukuzawa Tsuyoshi1,Katsumata Tomomi1,Kuroki Toshihisa1,Mikami Tatsuya1,Nakano Yoji2,Okumura Yasuhiro3,Souda Kenji3,Mutu Eride4,Sugawara Akitomo1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiation Oncology Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Kanagawa Japan

2. Department of Radiation Oncology Tokai University Hachioji Hospital Hachioji Tokyo Japan

3. Department of Radiology Tokai University Hospital Isehara Kanagawa Japan

4. Course of Advanced Medical Science Graduate School of Medicine Tokai University Kanagawa Japan

Abstract

AbstractDeep‐inspiration breath‐hold (DIBH) reduces the radiation dose to the heart and lungs during breast radiotherapy in cancer. However, there is not enough discussion about suitable breathing methods for DIBH. Therefore, we investigated the radiation doses and organ and body surface displacement in abdominal DIBH (A‐DIBH) and thoracic DIBH (T‐DIBH). Free‐breathing, A‐DIBH, and T‐DIBH computed tomography images of 100 patients were used. After contouring the targets, heart, and lungs, radiotherapy plans were created. We investigated the heart and lung doses, the associations between the heart and left lung displacements, and the thorax and abdominal surface displacements. No significant differences were observed in the target dose indices. However, the heart and lung doses were significantly lower in A‐DIBH than in T‐DIBH for all the indices; the mean heart and lung doses were 1.69 and 3.48 Gy, and 1.91 and 3.55 Gy in A‐DIBH and T‐DIBH, respectively. The inferior displacement of the heart and the left lung was more significant in A‐DIBH. Therefore, inferior expansion of the heart and lungs may be responsible for the respective dose reductions. The abdominal surface displaced more than the thoracic surface in both A‐DIBH and T‐DIBH, and thoracic surface displacement was greater in T‐DIBH than in A‐DIBH. Moreover, A‐DIBH can be identified because abdominal surface displacement was greater in A‐DIBH than in T‐DIBH. In conclusion, A‐DIBH and T‐DIBH could be distinguished by comparing the abdominal and thoracic surfaces of A‐DIBH and T‐DIBH, thereby ensuring the implementation of A‐DIBH and reducing the heart and lung doses.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Instrumentation,Radiation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3