Physiotherapy practices in the clinical assessment of lateral elbow tendinopathy: An international survey

Author:

Heales Luke1ORCID,Vicenzino Bill2,Bisset Leanne3,Bateman Marcus4,Hill Caitlin1,Kean Crystal156,Spyve Aleesha1,Jaques Ashlee1,Sansom Fergus1,Lowe Michael1,Obst Steven1

Affiliation:

1. Musculoskeletal Health and Rehabilitation Research Group School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences College of Health Sciences Central Queensland University Rockhampton Queensland Australia

2. Department of Physiotherapy School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

3. Menzies Health Institute Queensland Griffith University Gold Coast Queensland Australia

4. University Hospitals of Derby & Burton NHS Foundation Trust Derby UK

5. Research Institute for Sport and Exercise University of Canberra Canberra Australia

6. Discipline of Sport and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health University of Canberra Canberra Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackground and PurposeUnderstanding physiotherapy practices is important to identify variations from empirical evidence and highlight requirements for training. This survey explored international physiotherapy practices for assessment of lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET).MethodsTwo hundred ninety‐nine surveyed physiotherapists from eight member countries of the International Federation of Manual and Orthopaedic Physical Therapists completed the survey. Respondents rated their frequency of use (never, rarely, sometimes, often, and always) for items related to: patient history; diagnostic tests; grip and upper limb strength; cervical and neurological assessment; and medical imaging. To establish practices, the five response categories were dichotomised into routine practice (often, always) and not‐routine practice (sometimes, rarely, never). A response rate of ≥70% for each dichotomy was used to determine whether an assessment item was deemed routine practice or not, with items not meeting either criterion considered neither routine nor not‐routine practice.ResultsMost respondents were from United States (63%). The ‘chair pick up test’, ‘cervical special tests’, and ‘plain radiograph’ met our criteria for not routine practice (i.e., 70%, 72%, and 71%, respectively). All other assessment items did not meet the criteria to be considered routine or not‐routine practice.ConclusionThe chair pick‐up test, cervical spine special tests (e.g., Spurling's test), and plain radiography appear to not be routinely used in the assessment of LET. The finding that no assessment technique met the criteria for routine use may imply that physiotherapists adopt a nuanced approach to selecting clinical assessment items as opposed to routinely applying tests.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference42 articles.

1. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guidelines on the management of lateral epicondylitis of the humerus - Secondary publication

2. American Physical Therapy Association. (2020).APTA physical therapy workforce analysis: A report from the American physical therapy association.https://www.apta.org/contentassets/5997bfa5c8504df789fe4f1c01a717eb/apta‐workforce‐analysis‐2020.pdf

3. Australian Government Department of Health. (2019).Health workforce Australia: Physiotherapists.https://hwd.health.gov.au/resources/publications/factsheet‐alld‐2019.html

4. Manual muscle testing and hand-held dynamometry in people with inflammatory myopathy: An intra- and interrater reliability and validity study

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3