Affiliation:
1. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck Surgery San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium JBSA‐Ft. Sam Houston Texas U.S.A.
2. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery University of Washington Seattle Washington U.S.A.
3. Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute Seattle Washington U.S.A.
4. Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education University of Washington Seattle Washington U.S.A.
5. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck Surgery Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary Boston Massachusetts U.S.A.
6. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck Surgery Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts U.S.A.
Abstract
ObjectivesTo examine the otolaryngology residency selection process, including past experiences based on the medical literature and survey analysis of our present practices to generate recommendations for future selection system design.MethodsA mixed‐methods study, including a scoping review and a cross‐sectional survey, was completed. Four databases were assessed for articles on otolaryngology residency selection published from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2020. A 36‐question survey was developed and distributed to 114 otolaryngology program directors. Descriptive and thematic analysis was performed.ResultsUltimately, 67 of 168 articles underwent data abstraction and assessment. Three themes surfaced during the analysis: effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. Regarding the survey, there were 62 participants (54.4% response rate). The three most important goals for the selection process were: (1) to fit the program culture, (2) to make good colleagues, and (3) to contribute to the program's diversity. The three biggest ‘pain points’ were as follows: (1) Large volume of applications, (2) Lack of reliable information about personal characteristics, and (3) Lack of reliable information about a genuine interest in the program.ConclusionsWithin this study, the depth and breadth of the literature on otolaryngology residency selection have been synthesized. Additionally, baseline data on selection practices within our specialty has been captured. With an informed understanding of our past and present, we can look to the future. Built upon the principles of person‐environment fit theory, our proposed framework can guide research and policy discussions regarding the design of selection systems in otolaryngology, as we work to achieve more effective, efficient, and equitable outcomes.Level of evidenceN/A Laryngoscope, 133:2929–2941, 2023