Prognostic risk factors of buccal squamous cell carcinoma: A case–control study

Author:

Callander Jacquelyn K.1ORCID,Souza Spenser S.1,Eltawil Yasmin2,El‐Sayed Ivan H.13ORCID,George Jonathan R.13,Ha Patrick13,Ryan William R.13,Xu Mary Jue13,Heaton Chase M.13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery University of California—San Francisco San Francisco California USA

2. University of California San Francisco School of Medicine San Francisco California USA

3. Division of Head and Neck Oncologic and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery San Francisco California USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo describe the clinicopathologic presentation of buccal squamous cell carcinoma and identify risks factors for recurrence and overall survival.MethodsThis is a retrospective case–control study of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) treated at a single tertiary care center between 2010 and 2022. All patients with buccal subsite OCSCC treated during this time frame were included and paired with a randomly selected age and gender matched patient with non‐buccal OCSCC. Relevant data was collected via chart review.ResultsSeventy‐seven patients with buccal SCC were matched with 77 non‐buccal OCSCC controls. The median follow‐up time was 27 months (IQR 14–61). Median age was 67 years (IQR 57–75) and 53% of the cohort was female. Twenty (26%) buccal SCC patients experienced a recurrence versus 19 (25%) in the controls. Age ≥65‐years‐old increased odds of all‐cause mortality in the buccal SCC group, but not in the control group. Perineural invasion and positive margins increased odds of recurrence in the buccal group only. Overall survival and progression‐free survival did not differ between the groups, despite a greater number of T2 buccal tumors and T1 non‐buccal tumors.ConclusionsBuccal SCC presents at a higher T stage than other oral cavity SCC subsite and may exhibit variance in the pathologic risk factors that predict poor outcomes versus non‐buccal OCSCC. Despite these relatively minor differences, however, oncologic outcomes between these groups were similar.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3