Perceptual contrast reduces the judgments of learning of small‐font words and increases the judgments of learning of large‐font words compared with the no‐contrast conditions

Author:

Wan Bowen1ORCID,Zha Jinlian2ORCID,Zheng Xiaoqian1ORCID,Li Haifeng1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Psychology Fujian Normal University Fuzhou China

2. Pingxiang Health Vocational College Pingxiang China

Abstract

AbstractThe font‐size effect on judgments of learning (JOLs) refers to large‐font words being rated as more memorable than small ones when required to predict memory performance during the study phase. This study examines perceptual contrast as the prerequisite for this font‐size effect on JOLs and explores how perceptual contrast leads to this effect. In Experiment 1, perceptual contrast was achieved by inserting words with one font (e.g., 18 pt) into a series of words with another font (e.g., 70 pt) at a particular proportion (1:4). In Experiment 2, perceptual contrast was manipulated by presenting two different font words up and down in a pair. The results of both experiments showed that: (1) participants rated higher JOLs for large than small fonts under the contrast conditions, but the JOL difference between the two fonts was not significant under the no‐contrast conditions; (2) the JOLs of small‐font words under the contrast conditions was reduced compared with the no‐contrast conditions, but the JOLs of large‐font words under the contrast conditions was increased compared with the no‐contrast conditions. These results indicated that perceptual contrast was the prerequisite for the font‐size effect on JOLs. The reason for this effect is that, compared to no‐contrast conditions, perceptual contrast reduces the JOLs of small‐font words while increasing the JOLs of large‐font words. This study may deepen researchers' understanding of the mechanism of the font‐size effect on JOLs and help educators effectively guide students to learn.

Funder

National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3