The rebel, the professor, and the entrepreneur: Qualitative study to explore creator stories of FOAM

Author:

Zuckerman Matthew1ORCID,Pardis Parnian2,Horsley Tanya3,Dhanireddy Bhargavi4,YIlmaz Yusuf5ORCID,Gottlieb Michael6ORCID,Thoma Brent37ORCID,Chan Teresa M.8910ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine/Division of Medical Toxicology University of Colorado, School of Medicine Aurora Colorado USA

2. University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

3. The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Ottawa Ontario Canada

4. University of Illinois College of Medicine Peoria Illinois USA

5. McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

6. Ultrasound Division Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA

7. Department of Emergency Medicine University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada

8. Division of Emergency Medicine, Division of Education & Innovation McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

9. Department of Medicine, Department of Health Research Methodology, Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

10. McMaster Education Research, Innovation, and Theory (MERIT) Program, Faculty of Health Sciences McMaster University Hamilton Hamilton Ontario Canada

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThe free open access medical education (#FOAMed, or FOAM) movement creates educational content intended to inform medical education and clinical practice and is distributed in an unrestricted fashion (e.g., open access website). The who, what, and in particular the how of FOAM has raised important questions about the sustainability of the movement.MethodsWe recruited a diverse research team that included educational researchers, FOAM contributors, a business academician, and medical trainees to design and conduct a qualitative study exploring the work of FOAM creators. We analyzed the transcripts of interviews with 11 participants from top FOAM websites in emergency medicine and critical care. The team met frequently to iteratively identify and discuss emergent themes (major and minor) until saturation of concepts was achieved.ResultsCreators of FOAM could be categorized using three archetypes: the rebel, the professor, and the entrepreneur. The rebel was categorized as distinctly rejecting “traditional academic structures” yet was compelled to deliver educational content via alternative routes. The professor retained a traditional academic role, instead creating FOAM to supplement academic activities (teaching courses, disseminating scholarship, promotion). Entrepreneurs focused on creating a sustainable entity in an effort to supplement their income and reduce clinical obligations.ConclusionWhile all FOAM creators appear unified in their passion to create, promote, and distribute educational material with unfettered access to educators, their motivations for creating content could be differentiated. Given the grassroots nature of FOAM, creators share concerns related to financing, time commitments, and threats to sustainability of these businesses. The longevity of FOAM and what business models are best suited to support them are uncertain. Further exploration of the implications could investigate the best ways to engage with and support the different FOAM creator archetypes and develop models of sustainability.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Nursing,Education,Emergency Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3