Survival trends for left and right sided colon cancer using population‐based SEER database: A forty‐five‐year analysis from 1975 to 2019

Author:

Ulanja Mark B.1,Asafo‐Agyei Kwabena Oppong2,Neelam Vijay1,Beutler Bryce D.3ORCID,Antwi‐Amoabeng Daniel1,Governor Samuel B.4,Rahman Ganiyu A.5,Djankpa Francis T.6,Ulanja Reginald N.6,Nteim Grace B.6,Mabrouk Tarig1,Amankwah Millicent7,Alese Olatunji B.8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. CHRISTUS Ochsner St. Patrick Hospital Lake Charles Louisiana USA

2. CHRISTUS Highland Medical Center Shreveport Louisiana USA

3. Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA

4. Saint Louis University College for Public Health and Social Justice Saint Louis Missouri USA

5. Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences University of Cape Coast Cape Coast Ghana

6. Department of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences University of Cape Coast Cape Coast Ghana

7. Department of Hematology Oncology, Feist‐Weiller Cancer Center Louisiana State University Health Shreveport Louisiana USA

8. Department of Hematology and Oncology Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University Atlanta Georgia USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSurvival differences between left‐sided colon cancer (LSCC) and right‐sided colon cancer (RSCC) has been previously reported with mixed results, with various study periods not accounting for other causes of mortality.PurposeWe sought to assess the trends in colon cancer cause‐ specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) based on sidedness.MethodFine‐Gray competing risk and Cox models were used to analyze Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) population‐based cohort from 1975 to 2019. Various interval periods were identified based on the timeline of clinical adoption of modern chemotherapy (1975–1989, interval period A; 1990–2004, B; and 2005–2019, C).ResultsOf the 227,637 patients, 50.1% were female and 46.2% were RSCC. RSCC was more common for African Americans (51.5%), older patients (age ≥65; 51.4%), females (50.4%), while LSCC was more common among Whites (53.1%; p < 0.001), younger patients (age 18–49, 64.6%; 50–64, 62.3%; p < 0.001), males (58.1%; p < 0.001). The Median CSS for LSCC and RCC were 19.3 and 16.7 years respectively for interval period A (1975–1989). Median CSS for interval periods B and C were not reached (more than half of the cohort was still living at the end of the follow‐up period). Adjusted CSS was superior for LSCC versus RSCC for the most recent interval period C (HR 0.89; 0.86–0.92; p < 0.001). LSCC consistently showed superior OS for all study periods. Stage stratification showed worse CSS for localized and regional LSCC in the earlier study periods, but the risk attenuated over time. However, left sided distant disease had superior CSS per stage for all interval periods. OS was better for LSCC irrespective of stage, with gradual improvement over time.ConclusionLSCC was associated with superior survival compared to right sided tumors. With the adoption of modern chemotherapy regimens, prognosis between LSCC and RSCC became more divergent in favor of LSCC. Colon cancer clinical trials should strongly consider tumor sidedness as an enrollment factor.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3