Disparities in seeking care for olfactory and gustatory dysfunction: A population analysis

Author:

Gorelik Daniel1ORCID,Dhanda Aatin K.1ORCID,Khan Najm S.1,Takashima Masayoshi1,Nisar Tariq2,Brissett Ella1,Ramanathan Murugappan3,Pinto Jayant M.4,Rowan Nicholas R.3ORCID,Ahmed Omar G.1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Houston Methodist Hospital Houston Texas USA

2. Center for Health Data Science & Analytics Houston Methodist Hospital Houston Texas USA

3. Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA

4. Department of Surgery Section of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery University of Chicago Chicago Illinois USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionDespite effects on quality of life from olfactory and gustatory dysfunction (OD and GD), screening practices are limited, and patients’ self‐reporting of symptoms remains the only way to understand the burden of chemosensory dysfunction (CSD). Using a large population‐based database, we sought to understand factors leading to reduced likelihood of discussing CSD with a provider.MethodsThe 2013‒2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) chemosensory protocol was queried for factors influencing discussion of OD/GD with a healthcare provider. Sociodemographic, comorbidity, and objective OD/GD testing results were assessed with a multivariate analysis.ResultsOut of 146.1 million US adults, there were an estimated 41.4 million individuals with self‐reported OD/GD in the prior 12 months (28.3%). A total of 86.8% of participants did not discuss their problem with a healthcare provider. Men were about half as likely to speak with a healthcare provider (odds ratio [OR] 0.42; 0.26–0.66; p < 0.001) and those with a college education were about nine times more likely to discuss the problem compared to those with less than a ninth‐grade educational achievement (OR 8.83; 1.86–41.98; p = 0.02). Those with objective confirmation of CSD were still unlikely to speak with a provider (OR 0.77; 0.44–1.33; p = 0.36).ConclusionMen and those with less education are less likely to discuss OD/GD with a healthcare provider. These populations tend to be at increased risk for CSD, and there are severe downstream health and quality of life implications related to CSD. Dedicated screening and increased public awareness are critical to ensure more equitable care.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3