Responses of soil aggregation and aggregate‐associated nitrogen to straw return in China: Evidence from a meta‐analysis and a pot experiment

Abstract

AbstractEnhancing soil structure and soil nitrogen availability is the key to sustainable agricultural development in global cropping systems. Straw return can affect soil aggregation, but the results of recent studies on the influence of straw return on soil aggregation are not consistent, and the distribution and availability of straw‐derived nitrogen in soils are still unclear. Here, a meta‐analysis of the effects of straw return on soil aggregation was conducted based on 57 studies published in China over the past 10 years. Moreover, combined with a pot experiment, the distribution and transfer characteristics of the two main wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)‐preceding crops, corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) straw‐derived nitrogen in the soils were studied by using the 15N‐tracer method in the main wheat‐producing areas of China. 15N‐labeled straw was introduced into soils in pots at rates of 0.3% and 0.5% of the soil dry mass and incubated 60%–70% of the field water capacity throughout the entire growth period of wheat (220 days). A meta‐analysis revealed that straw return significantly improved the mass ratio of large macro‐aggregates (LM%) and small macro‐aggregates (SM%) but significantly decreased the mass ratio of micro‐aggregates (MI%) and silt plus clay‐size particles (CS%), with mean effect sizes of 36.27%, 9.06%, −8.26%, and −21.32%, respectively. The mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GMD) also increased by 21.48% and 15.64%, respectively. Compared with SM%, LM% made a greater contribution to the stability of soil aggregates. Moreover, only LM% showed a significant positive correlation with the corresponding aggregate‐associated nitrogen content, which was an important reason for the improvement in soil nitrogen availability after straw return. The positive effect of straw return on soil aggregation was greatest when the soil pH was close to 6.5–7.5, the average annual temperature was greater than 15°C, and the average annual rainfall was close to 800–1000 mm. The results of the pot experiment revealed that the proportions of straw‐derived nitrogen in >2 mm aggregates were 1.21–1.28, 1.50–2.23, and 1.34–1.74 times greater than those in 0.25–2, 0.053–0.25, and <0.053 mm aggregates, respectively. Moreover, the proportion of straw‐derived nitrogen content of aggregates of different particle sizes showed that the proportion of straw used to reach 0.5% of the soil dry weight was greater than 0.3%, which was 1.09–1.66 times greater, and that of soybean straw was significantly greater than that of corn straw, which was 1.50–2.28 times greater. At application rates of 60 g pot−1 and 100 g pot−1 straw, the absorption of soybean straw‐derived nitrogen by wheat was 1.83 and 2.15 times greater than that of corn straw‐derived nitrogen, respectively. In conclusion, straw return effectively improved soil aggregate stability and nitrogen availability, which was closely related to the increase in soil LM%. Soybean straw can stabilize soil aggregates better than corn straw, and its straw‐derived nitrogen is an important nitrogen source for subsequent wheat crops.