Barriers to, Facilitators of, and Interventions to Support Treat‐to‐Target Implementation in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review

Author:

Gossec Laure1ORCID,Bessette Louis2ORCID,Xavier Ricardo M.3ORCID,Favalli Ennio G.4ORCID,Östör Andrew5,Buch Maya H.6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, and Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hospital Paris France

2. Laval University Québec City Québec Canada

3. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Porto Alegre Brazil

4. University of Milan and ASST G. Pini‐CTO Institute Milan Italy

5. Monash University, Melbourne, The Australian National University, Canberra, New South Wales, and Emeritus Research Melbourne Victoria Australia

6. University of Manchester and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre Manchester United Kingdom

Abstract

ObjectiveTreat‐to‐target is recommended in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but its implementation is suboptimal. We aimed to identify interventional strategies targeted at improving treat‐to‐target implementation in RA by systematically reviewing published evidence on barriers to, facilitators of, and interventions to support treat‐to‐target implementation.MethodsSystematic and scoping literature searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, BIOSIS Previews, Derwent Drug File, Embase, EMCare, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and SciSearch were conducted to identify barriers/facilitators and interventions relating to treat‐to‐target implementation in RA. The quality of included studies was assessed using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists. Data related to barriers/facilitators and interventions were extracted, grouped, and summarized descriptively, and a narrative synthesis was generated.ResultsIn total, 146 articles were analyzed, of which 123 (84%) included ≥50% of the items assessed by CASP checklists. Of the 146 studies, 76 evaluated treat‐to‐target barriers and facilitators, from which 329 relevant statements were identified and regrouped into 18 target areas, including health care professional (HCP) or patient knowledge or perceptions; patient‐HCP communication or alignment; and time or resources. Overall, 56 interventions were identified from 70 studies across the 18 target areas; 54% addressed disease activity or patient‐reported outcome assessments. Of the 56 interventions identified, 36 improved treat‐to‐target implementation and/or patient outcomes in RA.ConclusionDespite long‐established treat‐to‐target recommendations, there remain many barriers to its implementation. Interventions to improve treat‐to‐target should be developed further and assessed, with a particular focus on tailoring them to individual countries, regions, and health care settings.

Funder

AbbVie

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3