Efficacy of intra‐articular injections of hyaluronic acid in patients with glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Familiari Filippo12ORCID,Ammendolia Antonio23,Rupp Marco‐Christopher4,Russo Raffaella5,Pujia Arturo56,Montalcini Tiziana67,Marotta Nicola28,Mercurio Michele1,Galasso Olimpio12,Millett Peter J.4,Gasparini Giorgio12,de Sire Alessandro23

Affiliation:

1. Division of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences Magna Graecia University Catanzaro Italy

2. Research Center on Musculoskeletal Health, MusculoSkeletalHealth@UMG Magna Graecia University Catanzaro Italy

3. Division of Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences Magna Graecia University Catanzaro Italy

4. The Steadman Clinic and Steadman Philippon Research Institute Vail Colorado USA

5. Division of Nutrition Clinic, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences Magna Graecia University Catanzaro Italy

6. Research Center on Prevention and Treatment of Metabolic Diseases (CR METDIS) Magna Graecia University Catanzaro Italy

7. Division of Nutrition Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine Magna Graecia University Catanzaro Italy

8. Division of Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine Magna Graecia University Catanzaro Italy

Abstract

AbstractSymptomatic primary glenohumeral (GH) joint osteoarthritis (OA) can be challenging to treat. Hyaluronic acid (HA) has emerged as a promising treatment for the nonsurgical management of GH‐OA. In this systematic review with meta‐analysis, we aimed to evaluate the current evidence regarding the efficacy of intra‐articular HA on pain relief in patients suffering from GH‐OA. A total of 15 studies (only randomized controlled trials providing data at the end of the intervention) were included. The relevant studies were selected based on the following PICO model: P: patients with diagnosis of shoulder OA; I: HA infiltrations as therapeutic intervention administered; C: no restriction for comparators assessed; O: pain, in terms of visual analog scale (VAS) or numeric rating scale. The risk of bias among the included studies was estimated using the PEDro scale. A total of 1023 subjects were analyzed. Comparing HA injections combined with physical therapy (PT) compared to PT alone resulted in superior scores, showing an overall effect size (ES) of 4.43 (p = 0.00006). Moreover, pooled analysis of VAS pain scores demonstrated a significant improvement in the ES of the HA in comparison with corticosteroid injections (p = 0.002). On average, we reported a PEDro score of 7.2. A total of 46.7% of studies showed probable signs of a randomization bias. The findings of this systematic review and meta‐analysis showed that IA injections of HA might be effective on pain relief with significant improvements compared to baseline and compared to corticosteroid injections in patients affected by GH‐OA.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3